Simulation-Based Design and Optimization of a Stand-Alone Power and Energy System for the High Arctic
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A thermal and electrical co-simulation was developed to evaluate and assess power and energy (P&E) systems for remote applications. A stand-alone hybrid system comprised of a solar array, a direct methanol fuel cell and a battery storage system housed in separate insulated enclosures was found to be a suitable option to autonomously operate a data-logging system year-long in the High Arctic. Parametric studies were conducted to optimize the insulation levels of the enclosures as well as the size of the power generation system and the control strategy used for thermal management. The versatile hybrid co-simulation model is able to capture the crucial interactions and trade-offs between thermal and electrical demands. A first version of the system was deployed in the High Arctic during the mid-summer season and successfully operated autonomously for four months – providing proof of concept and model validation for the hybrid P&E system. Subsequent simulations and parametric studies were run to determine and evaluate additional strategies to extend the autonomous operation of the system. Reducing the power consumption of selected components, increasing the renewable energy generation by installing coldclimate wind turbines, and scaling up the storage capacity by redesigning a new battery pack were found to be effective means of achieving extended operation. Simulation results indicated that the data-logging system could be powered for up to 8 and 12 hours daily during the winter and summer months, respectively, compared to just 30 minutes for the first version of the system with similar fuel consumption. Future work will focus on the simulation-based design of an improved system capable of continuous year-long operation and its validation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".