Decolonizing Diabetes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article presents insights into the colonial experience of Indigenous Peoples living with type 2 diabetes within seven First Nation communities in Northern Ontario. A constructivist grounded theory methodology, guided by a decolonizing and participatory action approach to conducting research with Indigenous Peoples, was utilised in this study. Twenty-two individuals with type 2 diabetes were interviewed. The main research question explored the impact of colonization on the lived experience and perceptions about developing type 2 diabetes for Indigenous Peoples. Using semi-structured interviews, the three main categories that emerged from the analysis of the interview transcripts were changing ways of eating, developing diabetes, and choosing your medicine. A substantive theory was developed that suggests that Indigenous Peoples, with type 2 diabetes, often live with the perception that there is ‘no going back’ to the way things once were prior to European contact. As a result, they have adapted the way they live with diabetes which can, at times, be at odds with Indigenous world views. An adaptation that considers a complementary approach to the way individuals live and manage diabetes including both Traditional and Western ways may provide a framework for a decolonized model of type 2 diabetes care for Indigenous Peoples.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".