MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4230054345 · doi:10.32920/ryerson.14646711

Obstacle detection using Microsoft Kinect

2021· preprint· en· W4230054345 on OpenAlexaff
Niclas Zeller

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicVideo Surveillance and Tracking Methods
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRANSACComputer scienceComputer visionArtificial intelligenceSegmentationObstaclePoint cloudSoftwarePoint (geometry)MATLABImage segmentationComputer graphics (images)Image (mathematics)Mathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This thesis presents the development of image processing algorithms based on a Microsoft Kinect camera system. The algorithms developed during this thesis are applied on the depth image received from Kinect and are supposed to model a three dimensional object based representation of the recorded scene. The motivation behind this thesis is to develop a system which assists visually impaired people by navigating through unknown environments. The developed system is able to detect obstacles in the recorded scene and to warn about these obstacles. Since the goal of this thesis was not to develop a complete real time system but to invent reliable algorithms solving this task, the algorithms were developed in MATLAB. Additionally a control software was developed by which depth as well as color images can be received from Kinect. The developed algorithms are a combination of already known plane fitting algorithms and novel approaches. The algorithms perform a plane segmentation of the 3D point cloud and model objects out of the received segments. Each obstacle is defined by a cuboid box and thus can be illustrated easily to the blind person. For plane segmentation different approaches were compared to each other to find the most suitable approach. The first algorithm analyzed in this thesis is a normal vector based plane fitting algorithm. This algorithm supplies very accurate results but also has a high computation effort. The second approach, which was finally implemented, is a gradient based 2D image segmentation combined with a RANSAC plane segmentation (6) in a 3D points cloud. This approach has the advantage to find very small edges within the scene but also builds planes based on global constrains. Beside the development of the algorithm results of the image processing, which are really promising, are presented. Thus the algorithm is worth to be improved by further development. The developed algorithm is able to detect very small but significant obstacles but on the other hand does not represent the scene too detailed such that the result can be illustrated accurately to a blind person.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.756
Threshold uncertainty score0.895

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.058
GPT teacher head0.322
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicVideo Surveillance and Tracking MethodsFrench-language works237,207