MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4230097396 · doi:10.4000/belphegor.242

Muñoz Corcuera, Alfonso et Elisa T. Di Biase. Barrie, Hook, and Peter Pan. Studies in Contemporary Myth; Estudios sobre un mito contemporáneo.

2013· article· es· W4230097396 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueBelphégor · 2013
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicCultural and Mythological Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtMythologyHumanitiesHookLiteratureMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pour lutter contre le vieillissement et les effets du temps qui passe, on aura beau nous vendre des sérums au venin de serpent, des crèmes à la larme de crocodile, des baumes à base d’écailles de sirènes, on sait bien que rien n’y fera et que le phantasme de jeunesse éternelle restera à jamais réservé à Peter Pan, cet enfant qui ne voulait pas grandir, cet enfant qui se refuse obstinément à grandir et qui veut, pour toujours s’amuser. Voilà peut-être qui explique la pérennité d’un personnage ...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.116
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.143
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread0.162 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it