MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4230160172 · doi:10.7202/1046054ar

INDEX

2001· paratext· fr· W4230160172 on OpenAlexvenueno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue du notariat · 2001
Typeparatext
Languagefr
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIndex (typography)Computer scienceWorld Wide Web

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

AUTEURS BROCHU, FrançoisLa réglementation relative à la publicité foncière 335 CUMING C.C., Ronald The registry system of the (draft) convention on international interests in mobile equipment and the (draft) aircraft equipment protocol 33 FRENETIE, François La fonction créatrice de droit du notaire québécois mesurée à l'aune de son activité principale 213 Copropriété divise et contributions à un ou plus d'un fonds de prévoyance 457 FYSON, Donald et NORMAND, Sylvio Le droit romain comme source du Code civil du Bas-Canada 87 LEDUC, Antoine Récents développements en matière d'harmonisation du droit des sûretés réelles mobilières à l'échelle des Amériques 51 MOORE, Benoit La notion de ( { parent psychologique Il et le Code civil du Québec 115

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.157
Threshold uncertainty score0.000

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0050.005
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0060.003
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.8430.789

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueRevue du notariatFrench-language works237,207