MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4230165015 · doi:10.1002/9780470057339.vag019

Global Circulation

2001· other· en· W4230165015 on OpenAlexaff
Gerald R. North, Samuel S. P. Shen

Bibliographic record

VenueEncyclopedia of Environmetrics · 2001
Typeother
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicMarine and environmental studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAtmosphere (unit)GeophysicsPlanetGeologyDifferential rotationGeophysical fluid dynamicsRotation (mathematics)Circulation (fluid dynamics)LatitudeRADIUSPolarAtmospheric sciencesPhysicsMechanicsMeteorologyGeodesyGeometryClimatologyAstronomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The shape of the earth is very nearly spherical with radius approximately 6400 km. The depth of the oceans averages about 4 km and about two‐thirds of the mass of the atmosphere lies within 10 km of sea level. This means that the atmosphere/ocean or the geophysical fluid system is only a very thin film of material moving and often swirling about the surface. The geophysical fluids are differentially heated by the sun, the tropical regions receiving much more solar heating than the polar latitudes. This differential heating, which takes place mostly through heating the earth's surface, sets up air currents, which overturn the fluid and redistribute the heating toward the poles. The earth also rotates about an axis with a fixed orientation in space. This rotation causes apparent forces on the geophysical fluid elements, deflecting them and leading to the formation of circulation patterns. The movements of the fluid media covering the planet form the complex of motions we call the global circulation, which is the main subject of this article.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.052
Threshold uncertainty score0.173

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0520.024

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.189
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEncyclopedia of EnvironmetricsSame topicMarine and environmental studiesFrench-language works237,207