MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4230180987 · doi:10.32920/ryerson.14648328.v1

De-noising the CN Tower lightning current signal using short term Fourier transform-based spectral substraction

2021· preprint· en· W4230180987 on OpenAlexaff
Mohammed Jahirul Islam

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicLightning and Electromagnetic Phenomena
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWaveformShort-time Fourier transformLightning (connector)Noise (video)Fourier transformTowerSIGNAL (programming language)AcousticsDiscrete Fourier transform (general)Computer scienceMathematicsElectrical engineeringPhysicsFourier analysisEngineeringMathematical analysisVoltageArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The CN Tower is a transmission tower and it is not unexpected that recorded lightning current signals be corrupted by noise. The existence of noise may affect the calculation of current waveform parameters (current peak, 10-90% risetime to current peak, maximum steepness, and pulse width at half value of current peak). But accurate statistics of current waveform parameters are required to design systems for the protection of structures and devices, especially those with electrical and electronic components, exposed to hazards of lightning. Since more electrical devices are used nowadays, lightning protection becomes more important. So to determine accurate statistics of current waveform parameters, the interfering noise must be removed. In this thesis we describe a technique for de-noising the CN Tower lightning current by modifying its Fourier Transform (FT) where a simulated current waveform (Heidler function) is used to represent the lightning current signal.The limitations of Discrete Fourier Transform (DFT) for removal of non-stationary noise signals, including the noise connected with CN Tower lightning current signals and its properties are discussed. The Short Term Fourier Transform (STFT) is explored to analyze non-stationary signals and to deal with the limitations of DFT. Last of all, an STFT-based Spectral Subtraction method is developed to denoise the CN Tower lightning current signal. In order to evaluate the Spectral Subtraction method, a simulated current derivative waveform ( obtained by differentiating Heidler function) is artificially distorted by a noise signal measured at the CN Tower in the absence of lightning. The Spectral Subtraction method is then used to de-noise the distorted waveform. The de-noised waveform proved to be very close to the original simulated waveform. A signal-peak to noise-peak ratio (SPNPR) of the CN Tower lightning current signal is defined and calculated before and after the de-noising process. For example, for a typical measured current derivative signal, the SPNPR before de-noising is 7.27, and after de-noising it becomes 151.30. Similarly for its current waveform (obtained by numerical integration) the SPNPR before de-noising is 20,16 and it becomes 361.39 after de-noising. Statistics of current waveform parameters are obtained from the de-noised waveforms. The Spectral Subtraction method is also applied for de-noising the electric and magnetic field waveforms generated by lightning to the CN Tower which enables the calculation of their waveform parameters.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.999
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicLightning and Electromagnetic PhenomenaFrench-language works237,207