MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4230223765 · doi:10.1149/ma2014-01/16/719

Improved Catalytic Reactor for the Electrochemical Promotion of Highly Dispersed Ru Nanoparticles with CeO<sub>2</sub> Support

2014· article· en· W4230223765 on OpenAlex
Holly A. E. Dole, Luís Felipe Safady, Spyridon Ntais, Martin Couillard, Elena A. Baranova

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueECS Meeting Abstracts · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicElectrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council CanadaUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCatalysisMaterials scienceElectrolyteElectrochemistryChemical engineeringYttria-stabilized zirconiaStoichiometryIonic bondingNanoparticleInorganic chemistryElectrodeNanotechnologyCubic zirconiaChemistryComposite materialPhysical chemistryIon

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Electrochemical promotion of catalysis (EPOC) is a promising method for enhancing catalytic activity through the application of a small electrical stimulus between the catalyst-working and counter electrode deposited on a solid electrolyte 1 . The electronic properties of the catalyst can be modified resulting in a change in catalytic activity. In the case of yttria-stabilized zirconia (YSZ) as a solid electrolyte, the addition or removal of O 2- species on the catalyst surface can be controlled in situ depending on the specified reaction conditions. Fully reversible and “permanent” or “persistent” EPOC has been reported for more than 70 various catalytic systems 1 . In reversible EPOC experiments, the reaction rate returns to its initial value after the electrical stimulus is interrupted. For permanent EPOC (P-EPOC), the reaction rate remains at a higher value than the initial open circuit value 2,3 . Despite receiving much attention, this phenomenon has not yet reached commercial application. One of the main technical factors preventing such development is the use of thick film catalysts with low surface areas and high material costs 4 . Ceria, CeO 2 , is a mixed ionic-electronic conducting (MIEC) material that conducts O 2- due to oxygen vacancies in the crystallographic structure in addition to conducting electrons at elevated temperatures. Furthermore, due to its non-stoichiometry, CeO 2 has the ability to undergo conversion between Ce 4+ and Ce 3+ quite easily 5 . These properties make the use of ceria-containing catalysts of interest for many applications. In heterogeneous catalysis, Pt group metals deposited on CeO 2 show a metal-support interaction (MSI) effect associated with charge transfer between the two solids that are in contact. In EPOC studies, using a MIEC can also ensure electrical connectivity between highly dispersed nanoparticle catalysts 6 . In this study, electrochemical enhancement of catalytic activity of a low particle size (1.9 nm) ruthenium nanoparticles catalyst for ethylene oxidation was investigated. Ru nanoparticles, synthesized using a modified polyol reduction method, were supported on CeO 2 resulting in a 1 wt% Ru loading (RuNPs/CeO 2 ) (i.e., typical in heterogeneous catalysis studies).The highly dispersed RuNPs/CeO 2 catalyst powder was supported on a YSZ solid electrolyte in order to apply polarization. The discussion of this study includes the effect of the partial pressure of ethylene with constant partial pressure of oxygen, temperature, and applied positive and negative current on the catalytic activity of the RuNPs/CeO 2 catalyst as well as the role of the cerium redox state in the observed persistent effect. In addition, the catalytic properties of the RuNPs/CeO 2 catalyst is compared to that of larger Ru particles supported on CeO 2 (TD-Ru/CeO 2 ) (same metal loading) and blank CeO 2 , both supported on a YSZ solid electrolyte. Characterizations of the catalysts were carried out using TEM and SEM. In addition, XPS analysis was done for the RuNPs/CeO 2 catalyst as prepared and “spent” (after the reaction). Overall, it was observed that only the RuNPs/CeO 2 catalyst could be catalytically enhanced, showing a pronounced enhancement (up to 2.5 times) of the catalytic rate for negative polarization. The opposite effect was observed for positive polarization. This effect of both positive and negative polarization is illustrated by Fig.1. Fig. 1. Transient effect of current application for C 2 H 4 oxidation over Ru/CeO 2 on YSZ electrolyte at 350°C for an applied current of -2 μA for 4 hours and +2 μA for 6 hours (0.012 kPa C 2 H 4 ). Apparent Faradaic efficiencies up to 100 were also determined, indicating a non-Faradaic effect. In addition, a persistent effect was observed, showing stability up to 16 hours after current interruption. The modification of the cerium oxidation state (i.e., reduction from Ce 4+ to Ce 3+ ) is proposed to enhancethe catalytic performance of the Ru nanoparticles. This is due to the presence of more oxygen vacancies in the ceria interlayer causing a stronger metal-support interaction.These results demonstrate the feasibility of in-situ modification of the metal support-interaction between Ru nanoparticles and CeO 2 catalytic support. References 1. C. G. Vayenas, S. Bebelis, C. Pliangos, S. Brosda, and D. Tsiplakides, Electrochemical Activation of Catalysis: Promotion, Electrochemical Promotion, and Metal-Support Interactions , Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York, (2001). 2. J. Nicole and C. Comninellis, J. Appl. Electrochem. , 28 , 223–226 (1998). 3. S. Wodiunig, V. Patsis, and C. Comninellis, Solid State Ionics , 137 , 813–817 (2000). 4. D. Tsiplakides and S. Balomenou, Catal. Today , 146 , 312–318 (2009). 5. A. Trovarelli, Ed., Catalysis by Ceria and Related Materials , Imperial College Press, London, (2002). 6. A. Kambolis et al., Electrochem. commun. , 19 , 5–8 (2012).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.801

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.203
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it