MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4230250840 · doi:10.1145/641029.641033

Rate adaptation transcoding for precoded video streams

2002· article· en· W4230250840 on OpenAlexaff
Zhijun Lei, Nicolas D. Georganas

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the tenth ACM international conference on Multimedia - MULTIMEDIA '02 · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicImage and Video Quality Assessment
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTranscodingMacroblockComputer scienceReal-time computingVideo qualityQuantization (signal processing)BitstreamFrame (networking)Frame rateBit rateComputer visionComputer networkAlgorithmDecoding methods

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In order to transmit pre-encoded digital video over heterogeneous networks, it is necessary to employ transcoding techniques that convert pre-encoded video streams into streams having different bit rates and quality. The specified problem is referred to as rate shaping or rate adaptation. In this work, we propose a new rate control scheme for H.263+ based video transcoding. The proposed rate control scheme is comprised of Frame-Layer bit allocation and Macroblock-Layer rate control. At the frame layer, scene context statistics from the incoming video stream are utilized to detect scene changes and determine frame type. The bit budget is allocated to frames according to their energy and frame types. At the macroblock layer, a novel linear Rate-Quantization model is used for selecting quantization parameters for macroblocks. Implementation and experimental results show that the proposed algorithm can provide accurate bit allocation, and can effectively alleviate visual quality degradation after scene changes. This rate adaptation scheme can be used to provide flexible video bit rate adaptation for transmission of pre-encoded video over heterogeneous networks.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.916
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0030.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.125
GPT teacher head0.324
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the tenth ACM international conference on Multimedia - MULTIMEDIA '02Same topicImage and Video Quality AssessmentFrench-language works237,207