MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4230279002 · doi:10.2118/2004-063

Local Updating of Reservoir Properties for Production Data Integration

2004· article· en· W4230279002 on OpenAlexaff
L. Zhang, L.B. Cunha, C.V. Deutsch

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian International Petroleum Conference · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicReservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProduction (economics)Computer scienceReservoir simulationReservoir modelingPetroleum engineeringGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Reliable reservoir performance forecasts with as little uncertainty as possible are key information for optimal reservoir management tasks. These production forecasts are directly related to the reservoir size and internal porous media properties. There is a need for improved techniques for production data integration to construct realistic reservoir models by using geostatistical techniques. A methodology is proposed that integrates production data into reservoir models by the local updating of porosity and permeability fields. The focus is on conditioning a proposed initial model to injection/production rate and pressure history in an iterative fashion. For each pass, a perturbation location is selected and master point locations are defined and used as reference to calculate the pressure and flow rate sensitivity coefficients subject to changes in porosity and permeability. The optimal changes of porosity and permeability at the master point locations are propagated to the whole grid by kriging. Integrating flow simulation and kriging algorithms within an optimization process constitutes the proposed methodology. This method makes it possible to condition the permeability/porosity distributions to injection/production rate and pressure history data from large reservoirs with complex heterogeneities and changes of well system with time. A field case application demonstrates that the proposed methodology is efficient and practical for large reservoir models. Introduction Many people are working on production data integration and several methods have been proposed. However, there is a challenge to condition reservoir property models to production data for large scale fields accounting for realistic field conditions. Direct calculation schemes are avoided considering that they are often limited to 2-D single-phase flow. Stochastic approaches such as simulated annealing or genetic algorithms require a lot of simulation runs, making them practically unfeasible for large scale application.(1,)(2)(3) Algorithms and software for production data integration based on hydrogeological developments such as sequential self calibration and pilot point methods have not proven applicable in complex reservoir settings with multiphase flow, 3-D structure and changing well conditions.(4) Streamline simulation based methods suffer the same limitations although some papers show that it has been used in large reservoirs.(5) The convergence of results for gradual deformation methods is very slow so that lots of iterations are needed for large 3-D models (6)(7). All the production data integration methods relay on flow simulation. Streamline simulation is commonly proposed as a solution to be used in large 3-D reservoir models due to its computational efficiency and analytical sensitivity coefficient calculation. However, the simplification of streamline simulation may promote computational efficiency at the expenses of accuracy reduction in cases of high heterogeneity with multiphase flow, 3-D structure and changing well conditions. There is a need for a novel computational efficient production data integration method that can be used in large complex 3-D reservoir models with many wells and long production and injection history. Basic Idea and General Procedure of the Proposed Methodology Our basic idea consists on the numerical calculation of the sensitivity coefficients on the basis of two flow simulations - an initial base case and a single sensitivity case.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.427
Threshold uncertainty score0.996

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.063
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian International Petroleum ConferenceSame topicReservoir Engineering and Simulation MethodsFrench-language works237,207