Phénomène de séparation pour l’équation de Prandtl stationnaire
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article est le résumé d’un exposé donné aux journées EDP qui ont eu lieu à la station biologique de Roscoff en juin 2015. Le but est de donner une preuve mathématique du phénomène de séparation de couche limite dans un fluide peu visqueux au voisinage d’un obstacle. Pour cela, on considère la solution de l’équation de Prandtl stationnaire, en présence d’un gradient de pression adverse. On montre que la dérivée normale de la vitesse tangentielle au voisinage de la paroi s’annule pour certaines données initiales, ce qui caractérise physiquement le point de séparation. On calcule également la vitesse d’annulation de cette dérivée. Cet article est publié sous une forme identique dans les actes du séminaire Laurent Schwartz.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it