MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4230298183 · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511777486.023

America

2010· book-chapter· en· W4230298183 on OpenAlexaff
Emily Mitchell Wallace

Bibliographic record

VenueCambridge University Press eBooks · 2010
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicPoetry Analysis and Criticism
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

“The most American thing that ever lived,” said Dorothy Shakespear Pound about her husband. Pound cherished his citizenship as an immutable fact, even when accused of treason. Among Americans he greatly admired, Henry James and T. S. Eliot became British subjects, and James Abbott McNeill Whistler disavowed his birthplace of Lowell, Massachusetts, claiming instead St. Petersburg, Russia. But Pound never considered denying his nationality in any way. And his native land was always in his thoughts all of his long life. He wrote to William Carlos Williams in January 1935: “A man's physical presence is infinitely less than his imaginative presence…I am much more present in Rutherford at this moment than in Chiavari or in the next valley” ( EP/WCW , 157). In his quaint sliver of an autobiography, “ Indiscretions ; or , Une Revue de Deux Mondes ” (1923), Pound boasts and apologizes in the same sentence: “It's one thing to feel that one could write the whole social history of the United States from one's family annals, and vastly another to embark on any such Balzacian and voluminous endeavor” (IND, 6). Pound's American roots and character, and his virtues and flaws, achievements and failures, as well as those of his country, require a canvas as large and grand as the continent itself, but here are some fragments on a miniature scale. Figuratively speaking, the tense interplay between the poet and American institutions can be dubbed bipolar, that is, highly emotional and sometimes irrationally manic or depressive behavior on both sides. At times the poet was a complete Yankee Doodle Dandy, in the best sense, though the feather in his hat was not macaroni but macaronic (a mixture of languages). In 1912 he stated his belief in the inevitability of “our American Risorgimento,” which “will make the Italian Renaissance look like a tempest in a teapot” ( SL , 10) and he worked selflessly toward that goal as long as possible. At the other extreme, he said of Mauberley, “he had been born / In a half savage country, out of date” ( P , 1990, 185).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.070
Threshold uncertainty score0.000

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.002
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0700.018

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.185
Teacher spread0.159 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCambridge University Press eBooks→Same topicPoetry Analysis and Criticism→French-language works237,207→