MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4230318208 · doi:10.1017/s0317167100017078

46th Annual Congress of the <i>Canadian Neurological Sciences Federation</i>

2011· article· en· W4230318208 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Gwenda Bryan, Young London, John M. Findlay, A Michael, Shevell Montreal, Timothy Benstead Halifax, Mike London, Serge Gauthier Verdun, Robert E. London, Douglas Calgary, James Toronto, Robert Lee, Robert Winnipeg, Jorge London, Richard Desbiens, Quebec City, David Fortin, Mark Calgary, Hans‐Peter Hartung, Germany Michael, Hill Calgary, Jackson Winnipeg, Daniel Ottawa, Terence Calgary, Adrian James, Perry Toronto, Suchowersky Calgary, Brian Toyota, Brian G. Weinshenker, Samuel Wiebe, André Barbeau, Lorraine V. Kalia, Suneil K. Kalia, H Chau, P McLean, Boston, Francis Mcnaughton, Jessica Furlan, Kkw Chan, Guillermo A. Sandoval, Roy A. Patchell, Karen McKenzie, Adrian W. Laxton, DF Tang-Wai, M Mcandrews, Dominik Zumsteg, J Wherret, Gary Naglie, Clement Hamani, Gary M. Smith, Andrés M. Lozano, ∑ Toronto

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMitochondrial Function and Pathology
Canadian institutionsAlberta Bible CollegeVancouver Biotech (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRussian federationAction (physics)Political scienceMedicineLibrary scienceComputer scienceGeographyRegional sciencePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Welcome to

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.275
Threshold uncertainty score0.672

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2010.059

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2011
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques→Same topicMitochondrial Function and Pathology→French-language works237,207→