Bibliographic record
Abstract
Citation (2018), "Index", Reid, I.A. and Dennehy, J. (Ed.) Seven Faces of Women’s Sport, Emerald Publishing Limited, Bingley, pp. 159-164. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-78743-710-420181010 Publisher: Emerald Publishing Limited Copyright © 2018 Emerald Publishing Limited INDEX Adams, Nicola, 22, 23 Advertising, sexploitation and, 25 Altruism, 46 Argentina, 66 Armistead, Lizzie, 22 Associated Press, 5 Athens 2004 Summer Olympic Games, 20 Athlete’s identity post-retirement, 91–94 Australia, 66 banning of women’s football game, 63 collective competition, 88 Cricket Australia, 137 sports journalism, 26–27 Barriers to gender, sport for development, 110–111 BBC, 23 BBC 100 women multi format series, 129 Begbie, Sheila, 134 Beijing 2008 Summer Olympic Games, 20 Beijing Platform for Action, 27–28 Bilge, S., 54 Bodies, 7, 45, 59–79 female, and development of women’s game, 66–69 moving, 128–129 Olympian’s, 24 sexual, 25 sporting, 25 Bolt, Usain, 22 Boston Breakers, 129 Brazil, 66 banning of women’s football game, 63 Brazilian Football Federation (CBF), 129 collective competition, 88 development of women’s game, 67–68 gender justice, 128–133 Brexit, 43 Brundtland Report, 51 ‘Burn It All Down Podcast’, 27 Camaraderie, 89–90 Cameroon, 61 Canada collective competition, 88 FIFA 2015 Women’s World Cup, 61, 63 Capital, 75, 95 human, 46 Capitalism, 4, 42, 49 ‘iron cage’ of, 73 neoliberal model of, 72 regulated, 72 Cawley, Evonne, 30 Chance to Shine programme, 139 China Beijing 2008 Summer Olympic Games, 20 Beijing Platform for Action, 27–28 FIFA 1991 World Cup, 64 temporal competition, 97 Women’s Invitational Tournament, 64 Club rugby, 134–135 Collective bargaining, 45 Commercialisation of sport, 41, 42, 97 Commodification of sport, 22, 73 Commons, 76–78 Communications Act 2003, 13 Competition, 7, 81–100 athlete’s identity post-retirement, 91–94 camaraderie, 89–90 collective, 86–88 de-competition, 84 defined, 85 gender and, 84–85, 92 hyper-competition, 83 internal, 94–96 operation of, 85 personal, 86 perspectives on, 82–84 temporal, 96–99 time for sport, 99–100 true, 84 values of, 85 Connor, Clare, 136 CORee, 35–38 Cricket, 136–137 global numbers, 137 past, present and future, 136–137 recreational, 139 regional, 137–139 Cricket Australia, 137 Cultural domains of power, 54 Danish Sport Institute, 42 Das Kapital (Marx), 73 Day, Sue, 134 de Coubertin, Pierre, 23, 33 Democratic People’s Republic of Korea, (DPRK, aka North Korea) National Olympic Committees, 36 PyeongChang 2018 Winter Olympics, 1, 5, 33, 35–38 Denison, Steve, 138 Deregulation, 72 Design thinking, 3, 53 Development, 102–103 gender, sport for, 101–121 sport for, 102 sustainable, 51–53 Dick Kerr’s Ladies, 63, 98 Dominant approach to gender, sport for development, 117–118 Donovan, Paddy, 141, 143 Dual careers, 7 Economic Modelling Specialists International (EMSI), 97 Edwards, ‘Eddie the Eagle’, 34 Employability, 7 English Cricket Board, 138 Ennis-Hill, Jessica, 25 Equality, 69–71 Equal pay, 45, 123 ESPN, 18 European Union (EU), 28, 48, 97, 124 Event governance, 55 Facebook, 20 Fair play, 20–21 Fair playing field, 53–55 Fake news, 12 Femininity, 7, 55 Feminism, post-colonial, 120–121 FIFA, 18, 23, 54, 95, 96 1991 Women’s World Cup (China), 64 1999 Women’s World Cup (Los Angeles), 64 2011 Women’s World Cup (Germany), 129 2014 Men’s World Cup (Rio de Janeiro), 129 2015 Women’s World Cup (Canada), 64 FIFPro, 130 Global Employment report 2017, 90 Football Associations (FAs), 23, 63 Forbes, 15 France professionalisation of the women’s game, 61 recognition of women’s football game, 63 Free markets, 43, 50, 72 Game-changing, 71–72 Gender, 14, 101–121 bias, 3 and competition, 84–85, 92 discrimination, 3 equality, 8, 15, 62, 81, 141, 142 equity, 6, 13, 42, 54, 81 imbalance, 4, 22, 138–139 inequality, 123 inequity, 41 injustice, 123, 128 investing, 95 justice, 2, 128–133 and political economy of sport, 44–45 relations, 14, 42, 83 Gender, sport for development, 101–121 barriers, overcoming, 110–111 critical theorists approach, 118–119 dominant approach, 117–118 gap between academics and practitioners, 109–110 girling effect, 113–114 interventionist approach, 119–120 post-colonial feminism, 120–121 role modelling, 110 safe spaces and empowerment, 111–112 social science contribution to, 116–117 ‘sport evangelist’ approach, 114–116 SWOT analysis, 104–109 Gender-based violence, 113, 123 Gendered spaces, 112 Gender Hub, 21, 28, 90 General World Cup Law, 96 Germany banning of women’s football game, 63 collective competition, 88 FIFA 2011 Women’s World Cup, 68, 129 Olympic Games 2016, 129 professionalisation of women’s game, 61 recognition of women’s football game, 63 Girl Effect campaign, 113 Girling effect, of sport for development, 113–114 Global Employment report 2017 (FIFPro), 90 Global Media Monitoring Project, 27 Global Survey on Gender and Media (2016), 28 Governance, 6, 41–57 athletic, 55 detective, 55–56 development of, 56–57 event, 55 fair playing field, 53–55 good, 8 internal, 55 meritocracy, 49–51 Neoliberal Project, 42–44 on and off the field, 55 and political economy of sport, 44–45 preventive, 55–56 sanction, 56 sports and sustainable development, 51–53 traditional sports, disrupting, 131 value and visibility, 48–49 value of sport, 48 youth, 124–126 Grasshopper’s hypothesis, 2–3 Guerreiras Project, 68, 128–133, 139 Hakim, K., 46 Hill Collins, P., 54 Hillsborough football tragedy, 16–18 Human capital, 46 ICC World T20, 137 Individualism, 73 Individualistic behavior, 83 ‘Individualization’ (Beck), 43–44 Instagram, 20 International Centre for Sports Studies (CIES) Football Observatory (2017), 72 International Cricket Council (ICC), 95, 136, 137 International Labour Organisation (ILO), 96–97 International Olympic Committee (IOC), 19, 35 International Women’s Day, 137 Intersectionality, 54 IRB, 95 King, Billie-Jean, 30 Korfball, 129 Labour rights, for women footballers, 130–131 Lampard, Frank, 24 Leadership, 53 skills, 25 Liberal egalitarianism, 119 Liga Águila Femenina, 61 Living wage benchmarks, 45 London 2012 Summer Olympic Games, 19–21, 26, 54 Los Angeles 1984 Olympic Games, 74 Mandela, Nelson, 35, 38 Martini Rosso Cup, 63 Marx, Karl, 73 Marylebone Cricket Club (MCC), 136 Mason, Emma, 126–127 Mass media, 12, 21 Maternity rights, 45 Mead, Margaret, 82–83 Media, 11–28 fair play, 20–21 gender equality, 15 global, for local delivery, 13–14 Hillsborough football tragedy, 16–18 mass, 12, 21 Olympic, 19–20 social, 11–14, 18, 20, 26 sports coverage, monitoring, 21–23 time and money, 14–15 Mediasport, 18–19, 20 Meritocracy, 49–51 M INC. >, 55 National identity, 29–33, 37–39 Nationalism, 29–31, 33, 34, 36, 38, 39 National Olympic Committees (NOCs), 36 National Women’s Soccer League (NWSL), 129 Nationhood, 5–6, 29–39 (Inter)nation story of sport, 32–35 Neoliberalism, 6, 41–44, 51, 72 Neoliberal Project, 42–44 Neoliberal self-governance, 114 Nepotism, 4 Netherlands, the banning of women’s football game, 63 Nike, 75 Nissan, 75 Ofcom, 12–13 Olympic Broadcast Services (OBS), 19 Olympic Games 2016 (Germany), 129 Olympic Korean Peninsula Declaration, 35, 36 Olympic media, 19–20 Olympic sport, criteria for becoming, 23 Orwell, George, 33 Packer, Kerry, 136 Papua New Guinea (PNG) 2016 U20 women’s football world cup, 2 Parlour, Tammy, 26 Pastime, 4, 6, 32, 53 Pedersen, Michael, 55, 56 Pellegrino, Aline, 68 Personal competition, 86 Personal relationships, 4 Picarte, Thais, 130 Podcasts, 26, 27 Political representation, 127 Post-colonial feminism, 120–121 Power cultural domains of, 54 organizations using disciplinary domains, 54 relations, 54 structural domains of, 54 Preference Theory, 46 Professionalisation of sport, 97 Raworth, Kate, 52 Recreational cricket, 139 Regional cricket, 137–139 Role modeling, 110 Role models, 25 Roundhouse youth governance, 124–126 Rugby, 131–135 club, 134–135 Scottish, 133–134 world, 132–133 Rugby Union, 131–132 member unions, 132 registered players, 132 Sandel, Michael, 50, 56 Santos FC, 68, 128 Scotland, 30, 63 banning of women’s football game, 64 rugby, 133–134 Scottish Rugby Union, 134 Sexploitation, 24–26 Sexual body, 25 Sky TV, 23 Social capital theory, 117 Social identity, 32 Social media, 11–14, 18, 20, 26 Sport for development defined, 102 gender in, 7, 101–121 Sporting body, 25 Sports defined, 11 journalism, making and shaping, 26–28 media coverage of, monitoring, 21–23 and sustainable development, 51–53 time for, 99–100 See also individual entries Star and Garter Club, 136 State intervention, 43 Strategic action in women’s sport, 123–140 Structural domains of power, 54 Suits, Bernard, 2 Sun, The , 21, 22 Super Bowl, 18 Sustainable development, 51–53 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), 51, 52, 107 Tartan Touch, 134 Thatcher, Margaret, 43 Time for sport, 99–100 Tokyo 2020 Olympics, 20 Triple bottom line, 52 True competition, 84 Twitter, 18, 20 UNESCO Gender and Media Alliance, 28 Global Survey on Gender and Media (2016), 28 United Nations (UN), 107 Sustainable Development Goals, 51, 52, 107 United Nations Commission on the Status of Women, 27 UN Women, 107 Value, 48–49 of sport, 49 Violence, gender-based, 113, 123 Visibility, 48–49 Warby, Danielle, 26 Waring, Marilyn, 46–47 ‘Counting for Nothing’, 46 Wealth of Nations (Smith), 43 Weber, Max, 73 Williams, Serena, 15, 25 Women economic and social position of women, 6 economic independence of women, 46–48 Women’s Football World Cup, 4 World Commission on Environment and Development, 51–52 World Communications Day, 12 World Economic Lab, 50 World Inequality Report 2018, 50 World rugby, 132 media and spectator figures, 133 strategic directions, 132–133 Women’s 2017 World Cup, 133 World Series Cricket (1977), 136 Yorkshire County Cricket Club, 137, 138 Youth governance, 124–126 action, 125 implementation, 126 meetings, 126 YouTube, 18 Book Chapters Prelims Introduction Chapter 1 The Face of Media: Continuous, Powerful and Adaptable Chapter 2 The Face of Nationhood: Women in the National We of Sport? Chapter 3 The Face of Governance: Economics, Value and Visibility Chapter 4 The Face of Football Bodies: ‘Resisting Market Enclosure and Imagining Another (Football) Future’ Chapter 5 The Face of Competition: The Beating Heart of Sport Chapter 6 The Face of Gender, Sport for Development Chapter 7 Strategic Action in Women’s Sport Conclusion Bibliography Index
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.006 | 0.009 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.013 | 0.009 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.745 | 0.764 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".