MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Prose, nonfiction

2015· other· en· W4230345768 on OpenAlexaff
Jason Camlot

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Encyclopedia of Victorian Literature · 2015
Typeother
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicPublishing and Scholarly Communication
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPeriod (music)PublishingKey (lock)PoliticsCriticismMedia studiesLiteratureSociologyHistorySocial scienceArtAestheticsPolitical scienceLawComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Nonfiction prose was not invented in the Victorian period, but it proliferated, flourished, and developed new generic and discursive forms and qualities within the growing complexity of Victorian society and its new technologies of textual dissemination. Victorian nonfiction prose taught, expressed, critiqued, and entertained new readers via a multifaceted infrastructure of publishing formats and venues, namely the significant proliferation of affordable books and periodicals. Some key genres of the period were reviews, essays, and other journalistic forms, philosophy, political economy and social criticism, sage writing and religious texts such as sermons, multiple forms of lifewriting, works of history, travel, science, and various specialized modes of academic writing.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.098
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Encyclopedia of Victorian LiteratureSame topicPublishing and Scholarly CommunicationFrench-language works237,207