MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4230376253 · doi:10.4296/cwrj2604558

Canadian Water Resources Association Scholarships in Water Resources 2001–2002/Bourses en ressources hydriques de l’Association canadienne des ressources hydriques 2001–2002

2001· article· fr· W4230376253 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Water Resources Journal / Revue canadienne des ressources hydriques · 2001
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicIntegrated Water Resources Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWater resourcesEnvironmental scienceHydrology (agriculture)ForestryGeographyPhysicsGeologyBiologyEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

(2001). Canadian Water Resources Association Scholarships in Water Resources 2001–2002/Bourses en ressources hydriques de l’Association canadienne des ressources hydriques 2001–2002 . Canadian Water Resources Journal / Revue canadienne des ressources hydriques: Vol. 26, No. 4, pp. 558-565.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.022
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.927
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0220.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0040.004
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.002
Bibliometrics0.0080.003
Science and technology studies0.0080.003
Scholarly communication0.0070.005
Open science0.0070.001
Research integrity0.0040.008
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0170.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it