Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction:.Iron deficiency is the most common cause of nutritional anemia. The highest incidence of anemia is found at the end of infancy and preschool. In the majority of families, mothers play an important role in the diet of children and the fulfillment of nutritional needs. One effort to improve the prevention behavior of anemia in children is the Calgary Family Intervention Model (CFIM). Method:.This research used preexperiment one group only with pre post test design. Samples were mothers with preschool children who attend kindergarten Muslimat Curungrejo Kepanjen Malang who meet the inclusion criteria of 22 (purposive sampling)). Calgary intervention/CFIM in prevention of anemia for 3 times meeting through home visits, each session for 50 minutes using the lecture, discussion, and counseling methods. The instrument used Food Frequency Quistionare (FFQ).Data analysis used Wilcoxon Sign Rank Test with 0.05. Result:.The result showed increased knowledge before (54,5 %) dan after (90.9%) with p value = 0.004. Discussion:.Intervention through home visits for 3 sessions by combining several methods play a role in increasing respondents' knowledge after the intervention. CFIM can improve mother's knowledge in the prevention of childhood anemia.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".