Circula : revue d'idéologies linguistiques. Numéro 2 (automne 2015), La médiatisation des idéologies linguistiques : voix d’auteurs et voix de lecteurs
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Riassunto: La ricerca indaga alcuni articoli di Bruno Migliorini apparsi nella stampa periodica e quotidiana dal 1942 al 1961.Nel rivolgere particolare attenzione alla lingua media e al suo funzionamento nella nazione, egli considera la lingua come strumento sociale e sottolinea la necessità che lo studio strutturale arricchisca la ricerca storica.Se Migliorini veste i panni del giornalista militante, mantiene sempre quelli dello storico della lingua, nella persuasione che le testimonianze storiche siano l'indispensabile ausilio a ogni studio sincronico.La ricerca fissa l'obiettivo sull'osservatorio linguistico di Migliorini e sugli elementi che suscitano il suo interesse: lingua letteraria, parole antiche e nuove, locuzioni malamente modellate, stranierismi adattati e no, voci dialettali, lingue speciali.Ne emerge l'azione educatrice di un linguista, che esce dal chiuso dell'accademia e si rivolge ai lettori dei giornali dell'epoca, affinché prendano coscienza del valore e del significato della loro lingua.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.012 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.007 | 0.007 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.014 | 0.009 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.096 | 0.031 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".