MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4230426387 · doi:10.32920/ryerson.14661654.v1

Ultra-High Frequency Photoacoustic Microscopy: From Organelles to Organisms

2021· preprint· en· W4230426387 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Michael J. Moore

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPhotoacoustic and Ultrasonic Imaging
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiological specimenMicroscopyAttenuationMaterials scienceOpticsUltra high frequencyNucleusAbsorption (acoustics)PhysicsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This dissertation describes novel signal analysis and imaging techniques for ultrahigh frequency (UHF, over 100 MHz) Photoacoustic Microscopy (PAM). New approaches for extracting information pertaining to object structure and scale are described, and novel sensing techniques and contrast mechanisms for imaging biological samples ranging from single cells to small organisms are presented. In the first section, I describe a methodology for assessing the structure of biological cells using UHF-PAM. The power spectra of ultrasound (US) pulses backscattered from MCF-7 cells, and photoacoustic (PA) waves emitted from their dyed nuclei were fit to analytical solutions to determine cell and nucleus diameter, respectively. The measured cell diameters (15.5±1.8 μm) and nucleus diameters (12±1.3 μm) were used to calculate the mean cell nucleus-to-cytoplasm ratio (1.9±1.0). Good agreement was observed between UHF-PAM measured values and literature. In the second section, I present a novel technique for PA image reconstruction that utilizes unique features in the PA power spectra as a source of contrast. The technique, termed F-Mode, provides a means for differentiating between objects of different scale that surpasses the capabilities of conventional reconstruction approaches. The ability of F-Mode to selectively accentuate absorbers of different size was demonstrated using experimental phantoms containing microspheres and cylindrical vessels, as well as in individual biological cells and live zebrafish larvae. Finally, I developed a new sensing technique, termed Photoacoustic Radiometry (PAR). Unlike PAM, which depicts optical absorption, PAR images depict the optical attenuation properties of the imaged object. It was demonstrated that PAR can be used to image transparent samples which generate no PA signals, and that simultaneous triplex PAR/PA/US imaging could be realized using our approach. Simultaneous PAR/PA imaging of biological cells, as well as zebrafish larvae in vivo, was also demonstrated. UHF-PAM provided excellent visualization of vascular organization in the larval trunk and head. The simultaneously acquired PAR images depicted anatomical structure (e.g. the notochord, muscle segments) not visible in PAM due to insufficient optical absorption. Potential areas of application for the new UHF-PAM techniques described in this dissertation include detection of cancer cells in blood samples, and investigation of tumour growth and metastasis. (6 zipped .mp4 files) https://digital.library.ryerson.ca/islandora/object/RULA:8618/datastream/Movies_Moore_mp4/view

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPhotoacoustic and Ultrasonic ImagingFrench-language works237,207