MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4230427536 · doi:10.1300/j006v22n02_05

Review of the Reliability and Validity of Myometry with Children

2002· article· en· W4230427536 on OpenAlexaff
Colleen A. Sloan

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical & Occupational Therapy In Pediatrics · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders
Canadian institutionsSunny Hill Health Centre for Children
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReliability (semiconductor)Physical medicine and rehabilitationMeasure (data warehouse)Muscle strengthValidityClinical PracticePhysical therapyPsychologyMedicineComputer sciencePsychometricsClinical psychologyData mining

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pediatric occupational therapists and physical therapists often measure muscle strength, and muscle strength frequently is cited as an indicator of function in clinical practice and in research. A reliable measure to quantify strength is necessary to accurately assess muscle strength so the values can be used for comparison, study, and indication of change. The hand-held myometer provides an alternative to traditional methods of manual muscle testing, and its reliability and validity have been examined in adults. The purpose of this review is to summarize the available literature relating to the reliability and validity of the hand-held myometer when used with children and to identify directions for future study in the use of myometers with children.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.011
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.036
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.061

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0110.036
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0060.006
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.315
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical & Occupational Therapy In PediatricsSame topicCerebral Palsy and Movement DisordersFrench-language works237,207