Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this thesis, the problem of data denoising is considered and a new data denoising method is developed. This approach is an adaptive, data-driven thresholding method that is based on Minimum Noiseless Description Length (MNDL). MNDL is an approach to subspace selection which estimates bounds on the desired Mean Square Error (MSE). The subspace minimizing these bounds is chosen as the optimum one. In this research, we explore application of MNDL Subspace Selection (MNDL-SS) as a thresholding method. Although the basic idea and desired criterion of MNDL thresholding and MNDL-SS are the same, the challenges in calculation of the desired criterion in MNDL thresholding are very different. In MNDL-SS, the additive noise effects are in the form of samples of a Chi-Square random variable. However, this assumption does not hold for MNDL thresholding anymore. In this research, we developed a new method for calculation of the desired criterion based on characteristics of noise in thresholding. Our simulation results show that MNDL thresholding outperforms the compared methods. In this thesis, we also explore the area of image denoising. In image denoising approaches, some properties of the image are considered. One of the well known image denoising methods, that outperforms other methods, is BayesShrink. We compare our method with BayesShrink. We show that the results of MNDS thresholding are comparable with BayesShrink in our simulations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".