MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4230478387 · doi:10.7287/peerj.preprints.26842

Book Review: Applied Time Series Analysis With R. Second Edition.

2018· preprint· en· W4230478387 on OpenAlexaff
Christopher J. Lortie

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicTime Series Analysis and Forecasting
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSeries (stratigraphy)Index (typography)Time seriesKey (lock)Computer scienceStatisticsData scienceEconometricsMathematicsWorld Wide Web

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Many data include time or have longitudinal dimensionalilty. When these data include an index of time, i.e. measures at regular or periodically successive intervals, statistics that use time sequencing in some capacity are appropriate. Consequently, investing time into a comprehensive text on these topics is not lost time. The second edition of Applied Time Series Analysis With R is reviewed. The benefits of digesting this text relative to other contributions is evaluated, the extent of expertise is summarized, and the structure including key topics of the book are described.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.020
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.103
Threshold uncertainty score0.345

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.020
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.001
Bibliometrics0.0050.007
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0030.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1030.195

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicTime Series Analysis and ForecastingFrench-language works237,207