Quad-multiplier packing based on customized floating point for convolutional neural networks on FPGA
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Deep convolutional neural networks (CNNs) are widely used in many computer vision tasks. Since CNNs involve billions of computations, it is critical to reduce the resource /power consumption and improve parallelism. Compared with extensive researches on fixed point conversion for cost reduction, floating point customization has not been paid enough attention due to its higher cost than fixed point. This paper explores the customized floating point for both the training and inference of CNNs. 9-bit customized floating point is found sufficient for the training of ResNet-20 on CIFAR-10 dataset with less than 1% accuracy loss, which can also be applied to the inference of CNNs. With reduced bit-width, a computational unit (CU) based on Quad-Multiplier Packing is proposed to improve the resource efficiency of CNNs on FPGA. This design can save 87.5% DSP slices and 62.5% LUTs on Xilinx Kintex-7 platform compared to CU using 32-bit floating point. More CUs can be arranged on FPGA and higher throughput can be expected accordingly.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it