Overload Fracture of Hydrided Region at Simulated Blunt Flaws in Zr-2.5Nb Pressure Tube Material
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A crack initiation and growth mechanism known as delayed hydride cracking (DHC) is a concern for Zr-2.5Nb alloy pressure tubes of CANada Deuterium Uranium or CANDU (CANDU is a trademark of the Atomic Energy of Canada Limited, Ontario, Canada) nuclear reactors. DHC is a repetitive process that involves hydrogen diffusion, hydride precipitation, formation, and fracture of a hydrided region at a flaw tip. An overload occurs when the flaw-tip hydrided region is loaded to a stress, higher than that at which this region is formed. For the fitness-for-service assessment of the pressure tubes, it is required to demonstrate that the overload from the normal reactor operating and transient loading conditions will not fracture the hydrided region, and will not initiate DHC. In this work, several series of systematically designed, monotonically increasing load experiments are performed on specimens, prepared from an unirradiated pressure tube with hydrided region, formed at flaws with a root radius of 0.1 mm or 0.3 mm, under different hydride formation stresses and thermal histories. Crack initiation in the overload tests is detected by the acoustic emission technique. Test results indicate that the resistance to overload fracture is dependent on a variety of parameters including hydride formation stress, thermal history, hydrogen concentration, and flaw geometry.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".