Rhetoric of Wounds: Trauma, Identity, and Interpersonal Relationships in Chuang Hua's <i>Crossings</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract: Chuang Hua's Crossings is a novel that reflects the pressures on individuals and families as they struggle to make a life for themselves in exile, both literally and metaphorically. As the protagonist, Fourth Jane's own emotional and psychological wounds reflect those of her Chinese-American Family, as they attempt to find a sense of stability and cultural identity in spite of being displaced from China, their home, and their culture. Each in their own way, the characters of Crossings try to reconcile their prescribed roles within traditional Chinese culture, with their changing lives and surroundings in Europe and America. The medical imagery, as well as the images of blood and wounds in the text, reflect this need for stability and healing. The characters of Fourth Jane, Dyadya, and Ngmah frequently employ the comforting familiarity of medicine, traditions, and rituals to heal their inner wounds and find a sense of belonging.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".