Innovative Advanced Technologies Overcome Directional Drilling Challenges ofS and J Type Wells in N. America and Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Innovative Advanced Technologies Overcome Directional Drilling Challenges of S and J Type Wells in N. America and Canada Sandeep Shashikant Janwadkar; Sandeep Shashikant Janwadkar Baker Hughes INTEQ GMBH Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar David Guinn Fortenberry; David Guinn Fortenberry Devon Energy Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar Brett Emian Dawkins; Brett Emian Dawkins Devon Energy Production Co. LP Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar Mark Kramer; Mark Kramer Devon Energy Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar Steve A. Privott; Steve A. Privott INTEQ Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar Tom Rogers Tom Rogers Baker Hughes INTEQ Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar Paper presented at the SPE/IADC Indian Drilling Technology Conference and Exhibition, Mumbai, India, October 2006. Paper Number: SPE-102028-MS https://doi.org/10.2118/102028-MS Published: October 16 2006 Cite View This Citation Add to Citation Manager Share Icon Share Twitter LinkedIn Get Permissions Search Site Citation Janwadkar, Sandeep Shashikant, Fortenberry, David Guinn, Dawkins, Brett Emian, Kramer, Mark, Privott, Steve A., and Tom Rogers. "Innovative Advanced Technologies Overcome Directional Drilling Challenges of S and J Type Wells in N. America and Canada." Paper presented at the SPE/IADC Indian Drilling Technology Conference and Exhibition, Mumbai, India, October 2006. doi: https://doi.org/10.2118/102028-MS Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex Search nav search search input Search input auto suggest search filter All ContentAll ProceedingsSociety of Petroleum Engineers (SPE)SPE/IADC Indian Drilling Technology Conference and Exhibition Search Advanced Search AbstractThe Barnett Shale field presents numerous drilling challenges. Meeting the increasing demands of natural gas requires economical development by efficient drilling of directional and horizontal wells. The standard technique for drilling S and J type directional wells was by utilizing steerable motors. This technique has several drawbacks: frequent trips to change angle of the AKO for the build/tangent/drop sections, poor hole quality due to string rotation, drillstring/BHA/casing wear, excessive cement volumes due to hole enlargements and high torque and drag due to wellbore tortuosity. Frequently the wells drilled in this field are closely spaced which require precise control of the well path to prevent collision. Steerable motors generate high wellbore tortuosity as corrections to the well path are made after every survey. Automated rib steering systems with rotating drill strings are cost prohibitive for this application.To overcome these drilling challenges a strategy was outlined that comprised of the new non-rotating automated rib-steering system for low inclined 3-D wellbores. Research, field tests and application of innovative and sophisticated technologies has resulted in the development of this state of the art directional drilling system.Since the introduction of the new technology many wells have been drilled in various fields of N. Texas and Canada with a build/drop rate up to 3°/100 ft. All sections of the wellbore (vertical, build, turn, tangent and drop) were performed without having to trip. Inclination of the tangent sections was maintained within +/- 0.2° of the target. Azimuth corrections were made without interrupting the drilling process and all directional operations were carried out by the system's automatic closed loop control. The new system has minimized hole enlargements, reduced torque/drag helping deliver a smooth, high quality wellbore and increased efficiency and quality of cementing operations. This has allowed the operator to log and set tubulars without incident and maximize the productivity from this field.This innovative directional drilling system can be utilized to drill 'S' and 'J' type directional wells without string rotation, low-inclination convoluted well profiles can be drilled with precision due to constant control over inclination and azimuth. Different sections of the well are drilled without tripping by the systems closed loop control.IntroductionLow porosity, along with other geological/lithological challenges, has hampered the efficient extraction of natural gas from the Barnett Shale for over 40 years. During the last several years, the operator has been utilizing fracturing technology, which has significantly increased production in the field.1 Drilling lateral sections further enhanced production/economics in the region.[1]Building on this success, the operator contacted a leading service provider to identify opportunities for improving drilling performance of low inclination directional wells. To meet the operator's aggressive drilling schedule and achieve performance improvement, a team of operator and service company staff developed a strategy that included application of advanced directional drilling technologies to meet the directional requirements as per well plan while significantly enhancing hole quality and wellbore placement precision. Keywords: drilling operation, directional well, Drilling Challenge, Directional Drilling, technology overcome directional drilling challenge, drilling performance, Upstream Oil & Gas, wellpath, prevent collision, rotation Subjects: Drilling Operations, Directional drilling This content is only available via PDF. 2006. SPE/IADC Indian Drilling Technology Conference and Exhibition You can access this article if you purchase or spend a download.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".