MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4230556236 · doi:10.1108/oxan-db235495

US tariffs will test trade alliances and architecture

2018· other· en· W4230556236 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueEmerald expert briefings · 2018
Typeother
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicGlobal Political and Economic Relations
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChinaInternational tradeChristian ministryEconomicsInvestment (military)International economicsBusinessPolitical scienceLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Significance The USTR will subject 284 more products worth 16 billion dollars to public comment. President Donald Trump is intensifying his efforts to return manufacturing to the United States by imposing steep tariffs on industrial imports from leading trading partners including China, the EU, Canada, Mexico and Japan. China’s finance ministry announced it would impose matching tariffs on 545 categories of US imports from the same date. Tit-for-tat retaliation and belligerent rhetoric are exacerbating concerns about the broader challenge to the global trade regime. Impacts North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) renegotiations are unlikely to conclude in 2018, increasing the chance of US withdrawal. Trade splits with allies will damage Washington's ability to coordinate efforts to confront China on unfair intellectual property transfers. Globally integrated manufacturing supply chains and financial markes will cause US-China trade actions to impact firms in many countries. Cross-border investment fell by 23% in 2017 according to the United Nations -- another fall is likely this year due to the trade conflict.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.112
Threshold uncertainty score0.373

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0060.002
Scholarly communication0.0080.004
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0040.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1120.022

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEmerald expert briefingsSame topicGlobal Political and Economic RelationsFrench-language works237,207