MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4230615358 · doi:10.1002/9781119181002.ch10

Environmental Factors

2016· other· en· W4230615358 on OpenAlex
Marc A. Rosen, Seama Koohi‐Fayegh

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueGeothermal Energy · 2016
Typeother
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicGeothermal Energy Systems and Applications
Canadian institutionsOntario Tech University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEnvironmental scienceSustainabilityGeothermal energyGeothermal gradientGreenhouse gasEnvironmental impact assessmentEnvironmental resource managementEnvironmental engineeringEnvironmental economicsEcologyGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Environmental factors of relevance to geothermal energy systems are covered. These include reductions in greenhouse gas emissions achievable with such systems. From an environmental perspective, preserving natural habitats in the ground by avoiding drastic changes in temperature and moisture content is an important subject especially when discussing the installation of ground heat exchangers at various depths in the ground. Geothermal system installation can incur environmental benefits and impacts, so both are discussed. The “thermal pollution” released from ground-source heat pump systems to the ground and potentially sensitive ecosystems is described. The chapter includes material that can guide regulatory agencies and industry towards designs and installations that improve and even maximize their sustainability and reduce or minimize possible environmental impacts.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.508
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0940.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.199
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it