MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4230627982 · doi:10.1109/thms.2014.2338532

IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems publication information

2014· article· en· W4230627982 on OpenAlexaff
Ellen J. Bass, David A. Abbink, Julie A. Adams, Arindam Basu, Barret Bell, Guo Bin, Erik Blasch, Catherine M. Burns, Cong Cao, W. Art Chaovalitwongse, Ricardo Chavarriaga, Irene Cheng, José L. Contreras-Vidal, Birsen Donmez, Michael C. Dorneich, David Ellis, Éric Féron, R. A. Hess, Ayanna Howard, Greg A. Jamieson, David Kaber, Alex Kirlik, Samuel J. Landry, John A. Lee, Cara L. Lewis, K Li, Hui Liu, Yi Liu, Zhi‐Hong Mao, Jan Marquard, David Mendonça, J. Meyer, José del R. Millán, C Németh, Jennifer J. Ockerman, Giuseppe Pirlo, Paolo Remagnino, Frank E. Ritter, Ling Rothrock, Nadine Sarter, Mei‐Ling Shyu, Laura Stanley, G Thomas, M. M. van Paassen, Johannes Wachs, Matthew Wright, Changxu Wu, Y. Yuan, Z Yu, Roberto De Marca, Howard Michel, Marko Delimar, John Barr, Peter Staecker, Ralph V. Ford, Karen Bartleson, Jacek M. Żurada, Gary Blank, Stephen Yurkovich, Dr Prendergast, Thomas Siegert, Business Administration, Matthew Loeb, Douglas Gorham, Eileen Lach, Corporate Compliance, Shannon Johnston, Ieee-Usa Chris Brantley, Donna Hourican, Patrick Mahoney, Cecelia Jankowski, Fran Zappulla, Peter Tuohy, Jeffrey Cichocki, Patrick Kempf

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicHuman-Automation Interaction and Safety
Canadian institutionsCanadian Standards Association
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceHuman–machine systemWorld Wide WebData scienceInformation retrievalHuman–computer interaction

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.650
Threshold uncertainty score0.927

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.3500.171

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.352
Teacher spread0.310 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Human-Machine SystemsSame topicHuman-Automation Interaction and SafetyFrench-language works237,207