MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4230713974 · doi:10.1109/iembs.2006.4397903

The Use of the Wavelet Transform in EMG M-Wave Pattern Classification

2006· article· en· W4230713974 on OpenAlexaff
Jillian Salvador, Hubert de Bruin

Bibliographic record

VenueConference proceedings · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMuscle activation and electromyography studies
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWavelet transformFourier transformPattern recognition (psychology)Artificial intelligenceWaveletClassifier (UML)Computer scienceShort-time Fourier transformDiscrete wavelet transformSpeech recognitionMathematicsFourier analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A system was previously designed to obtain estimates of the number of motor units (MUNE) in a superficial muscle and hence number of functioning motor neurons to that muscle. This method uses incremental stimulation of a motor nerve and subsequent recognition and classification of the elicited M-waves. In this earlier work we used the Fourier power coefficients as pattern classifiers. The presented work compares the Fourier transform classifier results with those obtained using a wavelet transform classifier. Data to test the two approaches were obtained from the thenar muscles of ten normal subjects. The results show that the wavelet transform is superior to the Fourier in classifying M-waves with significantly improved inter and intra-class variances.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.161 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueConference proceedingsSame topicMuscle activation and electromyography studiesFrench-language works237,207