MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4230716249 · doi:10.1504/ijdmb.2020.112850

MHCherryPan: a novel pan-specific model for binding affinity prediction of class I HLA-peptide

2020· article· en· W4230716249 on OpenAlexaff
Xuezhi Xie, Yuanyuan Han, Kaizhong Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Data Mining and Bioinformatics · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
Topicvaccines and immunoinformatics approaches
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHuman leukocyte antigenBenchmark (surveying)Computational biologyAlleleImmune systemArtificial immune systemBiologyComputer scienceClass (philosophy)PeptideArtificial intelligenceAntigenImmunologyGeneGeneticsBiochemistryGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Human Leukocyte Antigen (HLA) system or complex plays an irreplaceable role in regulating the humans' immune system. Accurate prediction of peptide binding with HLA can efficiently promote to identify those neoantigens, which potentially make a great change in immune drug development. HLA is one of the most polymorphic genetic systems in humans, and thousands of HLA allelic versions exist (Choo, 2007). Owing the high polymorphism of HLA complex, it is still pretty difficult to accurately predict the binding affinity. In this paper, we proposed a novel algorithm which combined convolutional neural network and long short-term memory to solve this problem. Our model has been tested with the experimental benchmark from IEDB and shows the state-of-the-art performance compared with other currently popular algorithms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.033

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.116
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.177 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Data Mining and BioinformaticsSame topicvaccines and immunoinformatics approachesFrench-language works237,207