MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Bodily senses

2015· other· en· W4230741219 on OpenAlexaff
Anthony Synnott

Bibliographic record

VenueThe International Encyclopedia of Human Sexuality · 2015
Typeother
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicEating Disorders and Behaviors
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHuman sexualityPsychologyPersonalitySightSensory systemScale (ratio)CommunicationAestheticsCognitive psychologySocial psychologyArtSociologyGender studiesCartographyGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sex is regarded by many people as one of the great sensual pleasures. There is a plethora of different sensory types: visual, aural, hands‐on, and more tactile, with varying oral and olfactory sensibilities. Such variations influence whether sex will be a playground or a battleground. Winnie Dunn has developed a scale of sensory types to facilitate an assessment of sensory compatibility; and Helen Fisher has developed another scale of personality types, with implications for sexual types. The specific roles of sight, smell, and touch in sexualities are explored in this entry, together with some consideration of the roles of culture in sensuality and sexuality.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.050
Threshold uncertainty score0.168

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0500.011

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.371
Teacher spread0.327 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe International Encyclopedia of Human SexualitySame topicEating Disorders and BehaviorsFrench-language works237,207