Bibliographic record
Abstract
Tremendous research has been done in the area of computer security using biometrics. But not much has been done in the field of inverse biometrics, which consists of synthesizing artificial biometric samples that can be used for testing exiting biometric systems or protecting them against forgeries. Due to the complexity of the data collection process and privacy and legal issues that are involved, finding volunteers for data collection is a challenging task. In this thesis, we introduce for the first time an inverse biometrics model for keystroke dynamics that can be used to generate as much data as desired. We show that these synthetic data behave as close as possible like real human data, making our inverse biometrics model a model of choice for testing the existing and upcoming biometric systems. Keystrokes dynamics biometric is a behavioural biometric technology, which allows user recognition based on the actions received from the keyboard while interacting with a graphical user interface. The proposed inverse biometric model first learns from the real human data and based on this experience, it generates synthetic users. Each synthetic user generated by model has a unique behaviour, but follows the properties of real human users. A twofold cross-validation testing technique is employed to validate the synthetic data using a suitable model. Comparable performance results are obtained when applying the model to real human data.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".