Call for Papers: ‘<i>Security in Mobile Wireless Networks</i>’
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Security has become a primary concern to provide protected communication in mobile networks. Unlike the wired networks, the unique characteristics of mobile networks pose a number of nontrivial challenges to security design, such as open peer-to-peer network architecture, shared wireless medium, stringent resource constraints, highly dynamic network topology, and absence of a trusted infrastructure. Ubiquitous roaming impacts on a radio access system by requiring that it supports handover between neighbouring cells and different networks. Also, mobile networks are more exposed to interferences than wired networks. There are several components that contribute to this: adjacent channels, co-channels, Doppler shifts, multipath, and fading. This SI aims at identifying and exploring different issues and challenges related to security aspects in mobile networks. What are the impacts (benefits or inconvenience) of mobility on security? What are the appropriate mobility models to have a good level of security? Are classical IDS approaches appropriate for mobile environments? How can security be managed in mobility pattern and/or behaviour prediction? Topics of Interest Secure mobile PHY/MAC protocols Secure mobile-routing protocols Security under resource constraints (e.g. energy, bandwidth, memory, and computation constraints) Performance and security tradeoffs in mobile networks Secure roaming across administrative domains Key management in mobile scenarios Cryptographic protocols Authentication and access control in mobile networks Intrusion detection and tolerance in mobile network Trust establishment, negotiation, and management Secure mobile location services Secure clock distribution Privacy and anonymity Denial of service in mobile networks Prevention of traffic analysis Important Dates Papers submission deadline: 30 September 2008 Notification of decisions: 28 February 2009 Final manuscript due: 31 March 2009 Publication: The 4th quarter of 2009 Instructions for Authors and Review Process Papers must represent high-quality and previously unpublished work. Original research papers are solicited in all areas of Wireless and Networks Security. All submissions will be peer reviewed by at least three experts working in the areas. The guidelines for prospective authors can be found online at http://www.interscience.wiley.com/journal/security. Prospective authors should submit their papers online at http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/scn. When submitting the papers, the authors should make sure to choose the Manuscript type as ‘Special Issue’ and enter the ‘Running Head’ and the ‘Special Issue title’ as ‘SCN-SI-007’ and ‘SecureMobile’, respectively.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".