MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4230845110 · doi:10.1090/noti2134

2020 Lathisms: Latinxs and Hispanics in the Mathematical Sciences

2020· article· en· W4230845110 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Pamela E. Harris, Alicia Prieto Langarica, Vanessa Rivera Quiñones, Luis Sordo Vieira, Rosaura Uscanga, Andrés R. Vindas Meléndez

Bibliographic record

VenueNotices of the American Mathematical Society · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicHistory and Theory of Mathematics
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersBanff International Research Station for Mathematical Innovation and DiscoveryNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMathematical Association of America
KeywordsMathematicsApplied mathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

celebrate our fifth anniversary, we are continuously striving to expand the diversity among our honorees, increase their visibility, and honor their stories.Below we present the profiles of five of the 2020 Lathisms honorees.These honorees were selected to illustrate the diversity of those who form the Lathisms community.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.056
Threshold uncertainty score0.186

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0000.006
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0560.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNotices of the American Mathematical SocietySame topicHistory and Theory of MathematicsFrench-language works237,207