Bibliographic record
Abstract
Consider a unit disk with two objects at unidentified locations. We examine the problem of two or more robots in search of both objects in the wireless communication model. We begin with two robots and both are needed to carry an object. Subsequently, we design several algorithms that describe robots trajectories in search of the objects. We were able to achieve a minimum worst-case search time of 6.7518 and a lower bound of 3 + π 2 . Additionally, we define two general cases and bound the worst-case search time for both. The first of the cases is for n ≥ 3 robots and an object can be moved by one robot. The second case is where we have n ≥ 3 robots and two robots are needed to carry an object. We achieve an upper bound of 1 + 2π n + sin (⌊n 2 ⌋ π n ) for the first case and an upper bound of 3 + 2π n + sin π n for the second case, with lower bounds of 2 + π n and 3 + π n respectively.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".