MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4230918009 · doi:10.1200/jco.2004.22.90140.581

Intratumoral and plasma concentrations of gefitinib in breast cancer patients: Preliminary results from a presurgical investigatory study (BCIRG 103)

2004· article· en· W4230918009 on OpenAlexaff
D. McKillop, Guenther Raab, Holger Eidtmann, A. Furnival, A. Riva, J. Forbes, J. Mackey, Matthew D. A. Spence, María Koehler, D. Slamon

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHER2/EGFR in Cancer Research
Canadian institutionsAstraZeneca (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGefitinibMedicineBreast cancerPharmacokineticsLung cancerAdenocarcinomaCancerInternal medicineColorectal cancerOncologyUrologyEpidermal growth factor receptor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

581 Background: Gefitinib (‘Iressa’, ZD1839) has a high volume of distribution in animals and humans, with a volume of 1400 L in cancer patients. Consistent with these pharmacokinetic data, gefitinib is extensively distributed into the tissues of rats and mice, with tissue:blood ratios of >10 in a number of organs. Concentrations of gefitinib in mouse subcutaneous tumour xenografts (LoVo: colorectal; A549: non-small-cell lung cancer) are considerably higher (10–15-fold) than plasma. Concentrations of gefitinib have been determined in plasma and breast cancer tissue as a secondary endpoint in a study designed primarily to identify molecular alterations in human breast cancer tissue after short-term exposure of patients to gefitinib. Preliminary concentration data are reported here. Methods: BCIRG 103 is a multicentre, open-label, noncomparative, presurgical study in women with invasive adenocarcinoma of the breast. Patients receive gefitinib (250 mg) once daily for at least 14 days and up to a maximum of 45 days prior to definitive surgery. Blood samples are taken immediately before and 24 h after the final dose of gefitinib. A sample of tumour tissue (100 mg) is taken and immediately snap-frozen during definitive surgery. Plasma and tumour samples were assayed for gefitinib and its major metabolites by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) with mass spectrometric detection. Results: So far, 16 out of 40 patients have been enrolled and samples from 9 patients have been examined. Concentrations of gefitinib in tumour (2.3–25.8 μg/g) were much higher than plasma (0.10–0.42 μg/ml). There was no apparent correlation between tumour and plasma concentrations. Conclusions: The pronounced tumour:plasma ratio (mean 54-fold) was much higher than that from the mouse xenograft model. Gefitinib tumour concentrations will also be compared with the biomarker data as they become available. Data on a larger sample size will be presented. ‘Iressa’ is a trademark of the AstraZeneca group of companies Author Disclosure Employment or Leadership Consultant or Advisory Stock Ownership Honoraria Research Funding Expert Testimony Other Remuneration AstraZeneca AstraZeneca

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.148
GPT teacher head0.488
Teacher spread0.339 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical OncologySame topicHER2/EGFR in Cancer ResearchFrench-language works237,207