MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4230936841 · doi:10.1080/13518040208430533

Book reviews

2002· article· en· W4230936841 on OpenAlexaff
J.N. Westwood, Michael Parrish, Frederick Zilian, Robert C. Grogin, Mark N. Katz, Rudina Xhaferri, Dale R. Herspring

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Slavic Military Studies · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSoviet and Russian History
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIndex (typography)PoliticsChapelCommunismChinaAllianceSpanish Civil WarEconomic historyHistoryArt historyPolitical scienceLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Matthew J. Payne, Stalin's Railroad: Turksib and the Building of Socialism, University of Pittsburgh Press, 2001. Pp.x + 384, 5pp. illus., map, 10 figures and tables, notes, biblio., glossary, index. $37.50. ISBN 0–8229–4166‐X. Sir Reader Bullard, edited by Julian and Margaret Bullard, Inside Stalin's Russia: The Diaries of Reader Bullard, 1930–1934, Oxfordshire, UK: Day Books, 2000. Pp.310, map, illus. £19.50. ISBN 0–9532–2131–8. Jay Lockenour, Soldiers as Citizens: Former Wehrmacht Officers in the Federal Republic of Germany, 1945–1955, Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 2001. Pp.255, biblio., index. $49.95. ISBN 0–8032–2940–2. Chen Jian, Mao's China and the Cold War, Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press, 2001. Pp.xi + 400, biblio., essay, index. $19.95 (paper). ISBN 0–8078–4932–4. Michael McFaul, Russia's Unfinished Revolution: Political Change from Gorbachev to Putin, Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press, 2001. Pp.xv + 383, index. $39.95. ISBN 0–8014–3900–0. Pierre Martin and Mark R. Brawley (eds.), Alliance Politics, Kosovo, and NATO's War: Allied Forces or Forced Allies? New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2001. Pp.284, index. $49.95. ISBN 0–3122–3817–7. Andrew Cottey, Timothy Edmunds and Anthony Forster (eds.), Democratic Control of the Military in Post‐Communist Europe: Guarding the Guards, Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan, 2002. Pp.xii + 273, index. £50. ISBN 0–3339–4624–3.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.072
Threshold uncertainty score0.983

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.089
GPT teacher head0.342
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Slavic Military StudiesSame topicSoviet and Russian HistoryFrench-language works237,207