Ionospheric Sluggishness: A Characteristic Time-Lag of the Ionospheric Response to Solar Flares
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The term “ionospheric sluggishness” is used to describe the time delay between maximum radio absorption in the ionosphere following the time of maximum irradiance during a solar flare. Sluggishness is one of the characteristic properties known to be maximized around D-region heights and can be used for studying lower ionospheric (D-region) and mesospheric chemistry. This article is our first attempt to estimate ionospheric sluggishness using high frequency (HF, 3 – 30 MHz) instruments. Specifically, we report on first estimates of sluggishness from riometer and SuperDARN observations following a solar flare and propose two new methods to estimate sluggishness. Sluggishness is shown to be anti-correlated with the peak solar X-ray flux and positively correlated with solar zenith angle and geographic latitude. The choice of instrument, method, and reference solar waveband effects the sluggishness estimation. A simulation study was performed to estimate the effective recombination coefficient, which was found to vary between 4-5 orders of magnitude. We suggest that the effective recombination coefficient is highly sensitive to D-region’s negative and positive ion chemistry.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".