MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4230999539 · doi:10.1080/03069400.2014.914732

Training the Dragon®: the use of voice recognition software in the legal writing classroom

2014· article· en· W4230999539 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Maureen B. Collins

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Law Teacher · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicArtificial Intelligence in Law
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTraining (meteorology)SoftwareComputer sciencePsychologySpeech recognitionMultimediaProgramming languageGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

AbstractWe are surrounded by technology – most of it designed to make our personal and professional lives easier. We have voice-assisted software at our fingertips. One conversation with Siri® and we know where to dine or who starred in our favorite movie. In the legal profession, technology is used not only to process words, but to conduct legal research, manage voluminous litigation documents, and track information on opposing counsel. Surely, then, there is a place for technology in the legal writing process. AcknowledgementsThe author extends her gratitude to Chandra Critchelow for her excellent research and assistance in the preparation of this article. She also thanks Michael Eisnach and Professor Julie Spanbauer for their editorial assistance and the John Marshall Law School for its support of research efforts.Notes1 See e.g. D. Hope, Voice Recognition Software Dictation Test (2013) at http://voice-recognition-software-review.toptenreviews.com/voice-recognition-software-dictation-test.html (accessed 3 February 2014) ("Dragon NaturallySpeaking is the most well-known name in voice recognition software"). Nuance Communications, http://www.nuance.com/for-healthcare/index.htm; http://www.nuance.com/for-business/by-industry/legal/index.htm (accessed 30 January 2014).2 Note Speech/Text Notepad by Khymaera is an example of a free downloadable application for Android platforms, found on the GooglePlay store. Voice Texting Pro by Sparkling Apps is an example of a free downloadable application for the iPhone/iPad/iPod touch platforms found on the iTunes store.3 Nuance's Dragon® Medical is one example of specialized VRS software for the medical profession. Nuance Communications, http://www.nuance.com (accessed 22 January 2014).4 AT & T's Bell Labs produced the first electronic speech synthesizer in 1936. The machine, demonstrated at the 1939 World's Fair, used a keyboard and foot pedals. The 1970s saw developments in the field when the Hidden Markov Modeling approach was invented by Lenny Baum of Princeton University. The HMM system became the basis for modern day VRS technology. In 1978, Texas Instruments introduced the popular children's toy "Speak and Spell". In 1982, Dragon Systems was founded by speech industry pioneers Drs. Jim and Janet Baker. Dragon released its first word dictation level speech recognition software in 1995.5 Most smartphones and tablets come with voice recording software already installed. There are many free applications in the iTunes app and Google Play stores. Macintosh computers feature a pre-installed voice recording system as part of the iLife package (called Garage Band) and the Windows operating systems have built-in VRS named SoundRecorder.6 Supra n. 1. Some additional types of applications include Siri Personal Assistant® for the Apple operating system and Google's cross-platform Voice Search for the Android operating system.® Siri Personal Assistant, http://www.apple.com/ios/siri/ (accessed 31 January 2014)‎; Google Voice Search, http://www.google.com/mobile/voice-search/ (accessed 31 January 2014).7 The training process helps the software personalize interpretation of the spoken word. The initial training process takes place before you begin using the software. You may be asked to identify your age, gender and regional origin. You will be asked to read one of the proscribed pieces of literature (from a children's book to Kennedy's inaugural address) for up to four minutes. You can add frequently used words to the VRS vocabulary with additional training.8 The oral commands can be used to navigate through the computer, or for editing in documents.9 Nuance Communications, http://www.nuance.com/for-healthcare/index.htm; http://www.nuance.com/for-business/by-industry/legal/index.htm (accessed 30 January 2014).10 See generally, J.J. Pavlick Jr. and R. Pearson, "Implementing the New 508 Standards for the Disabled" (2001) Procurement Lawyer 1; J. Jolly-Ryan, "Disabilities to Exceptional Abilities: Law Students with Disabilities, Nontraditional Learners, and the Law Teacher as a Learner" (2005) 6 Nevada Law Journal 116.11 Nuance Communications, http://www.nuance.com/for-business/by-industry/education/dragon-education-solutions/index.htm (accessed 30 January 2014).12 Ibid.13 Ibid.; Wikipedia, http://www.wikipedia.com (search for "Voice Recognition Software") (accessed 30 January 2014).14 Wikipedia, http://www.wikipedia.com (search for "Voice Recognition Software") (accessed 30 January 2014); Nuance Communications, http://www.nuance.com/for-business/index.htm#!ind_sol_list (accessed 30 January 2014).15 B.J. Everson, "Vygotsky and the Teaching of Writing" (1991) 13(3) The Quarterly 8–11.16 Ibid.17 Ibid.18 Ibid.19 VRS is also available in a variety of languages. A student more comfortable brainstorming or composing in her native Mandarin could do so, and then use the product to serve as a basis for a "translation" of the product into English.20 B.S. Flowers, "Madman, Architect, Carpenter, Judge: Roles and the Writing Process" (1981) 58 Language Arts 834, pp. 834–836.21 Ibid.22 Ibid.23 Ibid.24 Ibid.25 Ibid.26 The seven most common types of language-based disorders are: dyslexia, dysgraphia, dyscalculia, central auditory processing disorder, non-verbal learning disorder, visual processing disorder, and dysphagia. Learning Ally, www.learningally.com (accessed 28 January 2014). Dyslexia, a reading-based disorder that causes reading comprehension problems by inverting the order of letters, is the best known of these disorders.27 Ibid.28 Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, 42 USC §12101 et seq.; Equality Act 2010.29 www.usnews.com/education/best-graduate-schools/top-law-schools (accessed 28 January 2014).30 I. Leki and J. Carson, "Completely Different Worlds: EAP and the Writing Experiences of ESL Students in University Courses" (1997) 31 TESOL Quarterly 39, pp. 39–40, 54; T. Silva, "L1 vs. L2 Writing: ESL Graduate Students' Perceptions" (1992) 10 TESL Canada Journal 27–47.31 L.J. Solomon and E.D. Rothblum, "Academic Procrastination: Frequency and Cognitive-Behavioral Correlates" (1984) 31 Journal of Counseling Psychology 503; W. van Eerde, "A Meta-analytically Derived Nomological Network of Procrastination" (2003) 35 Personality and Individual Differences 1401.32 Ibid.33 G. Beswick, E.D. Rothblum and L. Mann, "Psychological Antecedents of Student Procrastination" (1988) 23 Australian Psychologist 207.34 A. Ellis and W.J. Knaus, Overcoming Procrastination (New York, Institute for Rational Living, 1977).35 S. Brownlow and R.D. Reasinger, "Putting off until Tomorrow What Is Better Done Today: Academic Procrastination as Function of Motivation toward College Work" (2000) 15 Journal of Social Behavior and Personality 15.36 Ibid.37 P. Steel, "The Nature of Procrastination: A Meta-Analytic and Theoretical Review of Quintessential Self-Regulatory Failure" (2007) 133 Psychological Bulletin 65 ("the prevalence and availability of temptation, for example, in the forms of computer gaming or internet messaging, should continue to exacerbate the problem of procrastination").38 I.L. Janis and L. Mann, Decision-Making: A Psychological Analysis of Conflict, Choice, and Commitment (New York, Free Press, 1977).39 J.R. Ferrari, "A Preference for a Favorable Public Impression by Procrastinators: Selecting Among Cognitive and Social Tasks" (1991) 12 Personality and Individual Differences 1233; J.R. Ferrari, "Psychometric Validation of Two Procrastination Inventories for Adults: Arousal and Avoidance Measures" (1992) 14 Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment 97.40 C. Senecal, R. Koestner and R. Vallerand, "Self-regulation and Academic Procrastination" (1995) 135 Journal of Social Psychology 607.41 Beswick et al., supra n. 33.42 E.D. Rothblum, L.J. Solomon and J. Murakami, "Affective, Cognitive and Behavioral Differences Between High and Low Procrastinators" (1986) 33 Journal of Counseling Psychology 387; K.L. Ferguson and M.R. Rodway, "Cognitive Behavioral Treatment of Perfectionism: Initial Evaluation Studies" (1994) 4 Research on Social Work Practice 283.43 C. Fischer, "Read this Paper Later: Procrastination with Time-consistent Preferences" (2001) 46 Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 249.44 Brownlow and Reasinger, supra n. 35, at p. 16.45 Ferrari, "Preference for Favorable Public Impression" and "Psychometric Validation", supra n. 39.46 Janis and Mann, supra n. 38.47 Beswick et al., supra n. 33.48 J. Stoeber and J.H. Childs, "The Assessment of Self-oriented and Socially Prescribed Perfectionism: Subscales Make a Difference" (2010) 92 Journal of Personality Assessment 577.49 Ibid.50 A. Onwuegbuzie, "Academic Procrastinators and Perfectionist Tendencies among Graduate Students" (2000) 15 Journal of Social Behavior & Personality 103.51 C.H. Lay and C.H. Schouwenburg, "Trait Procrastination, Time Management, and Academic Behavior" (1993) 8 Journal of Social Behavior and Personality 647; D.M. Tice and R.F. Baumeister, "Longitudinal Study of Procrastination, Performance, Stress, and Health: The Costs and Benefits of Dawdling" (1997) 8 Psychological Science 454.52 Ibid.53 Ibid.54 A. Johnstone, "The Writer's Hell: Approaches to Writer's Block" (1983) 2 Journal of Teaching Writing 155.55 E. Valarino and G. Yaber, "Overcoming Researcher's Block Symptoms: Creative Strategies for Research" (2002) 36 Interamerican Journal of Psychology 63.56 R. Boice, "Increasing the Writing Productivity of 'Blocked' Academicians" (1982) 20 Behavioral Research and Therapy 197; see also Johnstone, supra n. 54.57 M. Rose, "Rigid Rules, Inflexible Plans and the Stifling of Language: A Cognitivist Analysis of Writer's Block" (1980) 31 College Composition and Communication 389.58 Ibid.59 Ibid.60 Ibid.61 Ibid.62 In such cases, the institution should be obligated to pay for the software and associated expenses.63 See Appendix A.64 Headsets are often included with the software package. I recommend, though, that you consider investing a small amount (approximately $20) in a better headset to improve the quality of the transcription.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.708
Threshold uncertainty score0.989

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.244
GPT teacher head0.360
Teacher spread0.116 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Law TeacherSame topicArtificial Intelligence in LawFrench-language works237,207