MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Engage: A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Multi-center Study To Investigate The Efficacy and Safety Of Eliglustat In Adults With Gaucher Disease Type 1: 9 Month Results

2013· article· en· W4231010457 on OpenAlexaff
Suma P. Shankar, Elena Lukina, Dominick Amato, Majed Dasouki, Seymour Packman, Gregory M. Pastores, Sarit Assouline, Manisha Balwani, Pramod K. Mistry, Leorah Ross, Sachin Marulkar, Michel Peterschmitt

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLysosomal Storage Disorders Research
Canadian institutionsJewish General HospitalMount Sinai Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEnzyme replacement therapyMedicineClinical endpointPlaceboAdverse effectInternal medicineRandomized controlled trialAnemiaBone marrowGastroenterologySurgeryDiseasePathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Gaucher disease type 1 is one of the most common lysosomal storage disorders. Deficiency of the lysosomal enzyme acid-β-glucosidase leads to accumulation of glucosylceramide (GL-1) in the spleen, liver, and bone marrow. Enzyme replacement therapy has been the mainstay of therapy for the last 20 years. Substrate reduction therapy is another treatment approach that inhibits GL-1 synthase and ultimately restores the balance between synthesis and degradation of the substrate. Eliglustat is a novel oral substrate reduction therapy that is currently in development for the treatment of Gaucher disease type 1. ENGAGE (NCT00891202) is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, Phase 3 trial sponsored by Genzyme, a Sanofi company investigating the efficacy and safety of eliglustat in untreated adults with Gaucher disease type 1. Method Forty patients (mean age: 31.8 years; 20 males) with splenomegaly and thrombocytopenia and/or anemia were stratified by spleen volume and randomized 1:1 to receive eliglustat (50 or 100 mg BID depending on plasma levels) or placebo for 9 months. The primary efficacy endpoint was percent change in spleen volume (multiples of normal). Other efficacy measures included hemoglobin, liver volume, and platelets. Bone endpoints included bone marrow burden (BMB) scores and bone mineral density changes (DXA). Quality of life assessments included the Gaucher Disease Severity Scoring System (DS3). Safety monitoring included adverse event reporting, and lab and electrocardiogram evaluations. Results In patients receiving eliglustat vs. placebo, mean spleen volume decreased (-28% vs. +2%, P<0.0001), mean hemoglobin increased (0.69 vs. -0.54 g/dL, P<0.0006), liver volume decreased (-5.20% vs. +1.44%, P<0.0072), and platelets increased (+32% vs. -9.06%, P<0.0001). Significant improvements (eliglustat vs. placebo) were observed for total (-1.1 vs. 0.0, p=0.002), spine (-0.6 vs. 0.1, p=0.002), and femur (-0.5 vs. 0.0, p=0.026) BMB scores. Although patients with symptomatic bone disease were excluded, absolute change in total spine DXA Z-scores approached significance (least square mean treatment difference=0.2, p=0.06). Burden of disease, as measured by the Gaucher DS3, was significantly reduced following treatment with eliglustat vs. placebo (least square mean treatment difference=-0.3, p=0.0452). No patients discontinued due to an adverse event, all of which were classified as mild to moderate, and 39/40 patients transitioned into the ongoing open-label trial. Arthralgia and nasopharyngitis occurred in >10% of eliglustat vs. placebo patients. Conclusion ENGAGE met its primary and secondary efficacy endpoints. Significant effects on bone marrow and a trend toward BMD improvement in spine were observed. Eliglustat treatment was effective and well-tolerated in untreated adults with Gaucher disease type 1. Disclosures: Shankar: Genzyme, a Sanofi company: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Lukina:Genzyme, a Sanofi company: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Amato:Genzyme, a Sanofi company: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees. Packman:Genzyme, a Sanofi company: Consultancy, Research Funding. Pastores:Genzyme, a Sanofi company: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees. Balwani:Genzyme, a Sanofi company: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees. Mistry:Genzyme, a Sanofi company: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Ross:Genzyme, a Sanofi company: Employment. Marulkar:Genzyme, a Sanofi company: Employment. Peterschmitt:Genzyme, a Sanofi company: Employment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.022

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.317
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBloodSame topicLysosomal Storage Disorders ResearchFrench-language works237,207