MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4231011117 · doi:10.36510/learnland.v10i2.795

Editorial

2017· editorial· en· W4231011117 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Lynn Butler-Kisber

Bibliographic record

VenueLEARNing Landscapes · 2017
Typeeditorial
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicDiverse Educational Innovations Studies
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTheme (computing)ConversationRepresentation (politics)SociologyField (mathematics)Bridge (graph theory)Engineering ethicsPublic relationsMedia studiesPolitical scienceEngineeringComputer scienceMedicineWorld Wide WebCommunication

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

It is hard to believe that LEARNing Landscapes is celebrating its 10th anniversary and 20 issues of peer-reviewed, themed articles contributed locally, nationally, and internationally by members of the academic community, practitioners, and students. The thrust of LEARNing Landscapes has been to include diverse voices, multiple forms of representation, and to bridge theory and practice around topics that are pertinent and timely. The editorial staff has been supported enthusiastically by exceptional people in the field who have provided important and relevant commentary about the theme of each issue. This we believe has served to push the conversation further and reach out to a wider audience.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.727

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLEARNing LandscapesSame topicDiverse Educational Innovations StudiesFrench-language works237,207