MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4231014792 · doi:10.2523/75684-ms

Matching Technical Solutions to the Lifecycle Phase is the Key to Developing a CBM Prospect

2002· article· en· W4231014792 on OpenAlex
Matthew Blauch, Dana Weida, Mullen Mike, B. W. McDaniel

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of SPE Gas Technology Symposium · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCitationDownloadKey (lock)Computer scienceLibrary scienceWorld Wide WebEngineeringOperations research

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Matching Technical Solutions to the Lifecycle Phase is the Key to Developing a CBM Prospect Matthew E. Blauch; Matthew E. Blauch Halliburton Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar Dana Weida; Dana Weida Halliburton Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar Mike Mullen; Mike Mullen Halliburton Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar B. W. McDaniel B. W. McDaniel Halliburton Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar Paper presented at the SPE Gas Technology Symposium, Calgary, Alberta, Canada, April 2002. Paper Number: SPE-75684-MS https://doi.org/10.2118/75684-MS Published: April 30 2002 Cite View This Citation Add to Citation Manager Share Icon Share Twitter LinkedIn Get Permissions Search Site Citation Blauch, Matthew E., Weida, Dana, Mullen, Mike, and B. W. McDaniel. "Matching Technical Solutions to the Lifecycle Phase is the Key to Developing a CBM Prospect." Paper presented at the SPE Gas Technology Symposium, Calgary, Alberta, Canada, April 2002. doi: https://doi.org/10.2118/75684-MS Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentAll ProceedingsSociety of Petroleum Engineers (SPE)SPE Unconventional Resources Conference / Gas Technology Symposium Search Advanced Search Abstract The early stages of a coalbed methane (CBM) project development often require more extensive use of currently available technologies than can be economically justified when approached from a conventional oil and gas drilling focus. As a result, key evaluation tools and technologies are either omitted or not considered before significant decisions are made regarding viability of a CBM play. Understanding that the various lifecycle phases will each affect different objectives and decision points is important. Following site acquisition and estimating basic drilling costs, at least five lifecycle phases can be identified: (1) Regional Resource Reconnaissance, (2) Local Asset Evaluation, (3) Early Development, (4) Mature Development; and (5) Declining Production.A systematic review of current and recently developed enabling technologies is presented in the context of their potential use and applicability. Environmental risk and other constraints that can impact development vary globally, as do economics and production forecasting. New and emerging chemical technologies, as well as hydraulic fracturing refinements, play key roles in various lifecycle phases and decision making to identify successful CBM development projects as early as possible. The paper presents strategies that can reduce development phase failure risk and help predict or rank production potential. Economic constraints usually become more restrictive as the lifecycle moves to Phase 4 and beyond, but key information needed to enter Phase 4 is often overlooked. Examples of this scenario are presented from a global perspective.Globally, new and existing technologies combined with dynamic gas and electricity markets are changing the nature of CBM development opportunities. More accurate and timely go/no-go information needs to be used in the decision making process. Converting development opportunities to develop-ment successes involves integrating planning and evaluation methods, using targeted development technologies in the proper phase, and managing risk. Keywords: drillstem testing, permeability, completion effectiveness, upstream oil & gas, coal seam gas, hydraulic fracturing, complex reservoir, lifecycle phase, technical solution, mullen Subjects: Drilling Operations, Hydraulic Fracturing, Well & Reservoir Surveillance and Monitoring, Reservoir Characterization, Reservoir Fluid Dynamics, Reservoir Simulation, Formation Evaluation & Management, Reserves Evaluation, Unconventional and Complex Reservoirs, Environment Copyright 2002, Society of Petroleum Engineers You can access this article if you purchase or spend a download.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.357
Threshold uncertainty score0.651

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it