MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Unexpected hematoma due to heparin prophylaxis in transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flap reconstruction

2001· article· en· W4231021657 on OpenAlexaff
Ayaz Hussain Shaikh, James R. Bain

Bibliographic record

VenuePlastic Surgery · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCase Reports on Hematomas
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineHematomaHeparinSurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

P rophylactic heparin came into widespread use after low dose or mini-dose heparin (low dose unfractionated heparin [LDUH]) was found to be effective in significantly reducing the risk of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism, without major bleeding complications. This regimen is the standard for comparison with other methods, and it is the mainstay in moderate and high risk general surgery patients (1). It is thought to work because heparin concentrations that are too small to block the extension of preformed thrombi can prevent the activation of clotting factors that are high in the intrinsic clotting cascade from leading to thrombin production and thrombus formation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePlastic SurgerySame topicCase Reports on HematomasFrench-language works237,207