MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4231024935 · doi:10.1086/375508

The Anisotropy of the Microwave Background to<i>l</i>= 3500: Mosaic Observations with the Cosmic Background Imager

2003· article· en· W4231024935 on OpenAlexaff
T. J. Pearson, Brian Mason, A. C. S. Readhead, M. C. Shepherd, Jonathan Sievers, P. S. Udomprasert, J. K. Cartwright, Alison J. Farmer, S. Padin, S. T. Myers, J. Richard Bond, Carlo Contaldi, Ue‐Li Pen, S. Prunet, D. Pogosyan, J. E. Carlstrom, J. M. Kovac, E. M. Leitch, C. Pryke, N. W. Halverson, W. L. Holzapfel, Pablo Altamirano, L. Bronfman, Simón Casassus, J. May, M. Joy

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Astrophysical Journal · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicRadio Astronomy Observations and Technology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of AlbertaCanadian Institute for Theoretical AstrophysicsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsCosmic microwave backgroundAstrophysicsSpectral densityCosmic background radiationGalaxyQuasarReionizationPoint sourceSpectral lineAstronomyAnisotropyOpticsRedshift

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Using the Cosmic Background Imager (CBI), a 13-element interferometer array operating in the 26-36 GHz frequency band, we have observed 40 deg 2 of sky in three pairs of fields, each ~145' × 165', using overlapping pointings (mosaicking). We present images and power spectra of the cosmic microwave background radiation in these mosaic fields. We remove ground radiation and other low-level contaminating signals by differencing matched observations of the fields in each pair. The primary foreground contamination is due to point sources (radio galaxies and quasars). We have subtracted the strongest sources from the data using higher resolution measurements, and we have projected out the response to other sources of known position in the power spectrum analysis. The images show features on scales ~6'-15', corresponding to masses ~(5-80) × 10 14 M ☉ at the surface of last scattering, which are likely to be the seeds of clusters of galaxies. The power spectrum estimates have a resolution Δ l ≈ 200 and are consistent with earlier results in the multipole range l ≲ 1000. The power spectrum is detected with high signal-to-noise ratio in the range 300 ≲ l ≲ 1700. For 1700 ≲ l ≲ 3000 the observations are consistent with the results from more sensitive CBI deep field observations. The results agree with the extrapolation of cosmological models fitted to observations at lower l and show the predicted drop at high l (the "damping tail").

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.024

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations281
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Astrophysical JournalSame topicRadio Astronomy Observations and TechnologyFrench-language works237,207