MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4231034365 · doi:10.1515/9783839443767-004

3. Gender in Federal Canadian Policy Analysis

2018· book-chapter· en· W4231034365 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

Venuetranscript Verlag eBooks · 2018
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicGender Politics and Representation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Chapter three is the first of the two chapters in which I present the analysis of my empirical data.In its first section, I discuss the Canadian political and administrative system as the environment for implementation of Gender-Based Analysis, or GBA.In the second part, I introduce GBA as the main tool used in the Canadian federal bureaucracy.Third, I present empirical findings from the interviews with policy analysis and gender experts from three Canadian federal departments who consented to open use of their interviews.In sub-chapter four, I discuss interviews with Canadian federal employees in all interviewed departments, examining the institutional drivers and factors that hinder systematic GBA implementation.The last section summarizes the state of GBA implementation in the Canadian federal bureaucracy.Before I begin, it should be noted that policy analysis is the term preferred in the public service context in Canada (and the U.S.).Impact assessment is more typically used by private sector developers on a project level in the North-American context. 1 Accordingly, I will use the term policy analysis in this chapter. Canadian Political System and Policy AnalysisCanada has three levels of government: Federal, provincial, and municipal.At the federal level, Canada is a constitutional monarchy with a bicameral, multi-party, parliamentary system-the Westminster system, based on the British model.Legislative and judicial powers are designated in the two Constitution Acts of 1867 and 1982). 2 1 | For a detailed discussion on international IA terminology, see chapter 1.3.; for tool typologies see subchapter 1.6. 2 | Brettel 2009a, 65.involved, analysts work with particular, individually structured, analytical tools or a combination thereof, representing a "contextualized lens." 10 In this environment, GBA can be applied "when appropriate" 11 as a single, independent add-on policy analysis tool.Traditionally, the Canadian model of public administration is marked by compromises made to accommodate the diverse needs of Canada's multi-cultural population, often yielding results that are cooked "not too hot, not too cold." 12This public service attitude is based on a multiculturalist interpretation of the Canadian Charter of Human Rights (1982), stipulated under Section 27. 13 Diversity of representation plays a vital role in this model.In Canada's federal public service the belief is widespread that in order for actions to be fair and inclusive, public sector employees must represent a diversity of gender, race, age, language, ethnic origin or aboriginal status, religion and disability. 14 However, some Canadian feminist researchers, such as Louise Chappell, have pointed out that despite the desire for or appearance of egalitarianism and diversity among public sector services and employees, the default norm continues to be neutral in an androcentric way.Perceptions of "[] appropriate forms of behaviour in the public service are, in fact, masculine." 15 While normative standards of acceptable, expected, rewarded behaviour might consist to be masculinist, the Canadian bureaucracy has feminised.Canada has over 200,000 public servants in the Core Public Administration (CPA), working in 27 federal departments and agencies and managed by the Treasury Board. 16 Employment equity policies in the Canadian bureaucracy seem to have proven effective, at least for women: For instance, in 2010, 54.8 per cent of public sector employees were female and 45.2 per cent were male. 17Another study, however, 10 | Atkinson et al. 2013, 142.11 | The official French translation is Analyse Comparative Entre Les Sexes (ACS), demarcating a theoretical framing disparity between the focus on biological sex in French and the socially constructed gender English.A linguistic analysis of origin and potential consequences for instrument application of those different connotations needs to be conducted before the background of the different Francophone and Anglophone philosophical and theoretical traditions and cannot be covered in the realm of this study.12 | Pal 2004, 200.Despite struggling with questions of framing and fit, participation and control, Canada does attempt to include e.g.indigenous knowledge or questions of sexual governance in its bureaucracy and policy making processes (Abele 2007; Smith 2007; Fleras/Maaka 2010).For questions of the representation of women in Canada's parliament and political parties, consult (Bashevkin 2009).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.774
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it