MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4231034365 · doi:10.1515/9783839443767-004

3. Gender in Federal Canadian Policy Analysis

2018· book-chapter· en· W4231034365 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

Revuetranscript Verlag eBooks · 2018
Typebook-chapter
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueGender Politics and Representation
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPolitical science

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Chapter three is the first of the two chapters in which I present the analysis of my empirical data.In its first section, I discuss the Canadian political and administrative system as the environment for implementation of Gender-Based Analysis, or GBA.In the second part, I introduce GBA as the main tool used in the Canadian federal bureaucracy.Third, I present empirical findings from the interviews with policy analysis and gender experts from three Canadian federal departments who consented to open use of their interviews.In sub-chapter four, I discuss interviews with Canadian federal employees in all interviewed departments, examining the institutional drivers and factors that hinder systematic GBA implementation.The last section summarizes the state of GBA implementation in the Canadian federal bureaucracy.Before I begin, it should be noted that policy analysis is the term preferred in the public service context in Canada (and the U.S.).Impact assessment is more typically used by private sector developers on a project level in the North-American context. 1 Accordingly, I will use the term policy analysis in this chapter. Canadian Political System and Policy AnalysisCanada has three levels of government: Federal, provincial, and municipal.At the federal level, Canada is a constitutional monarchy with a bicameral, multi-party, parliamentary system-the Westminster system, based on the British model.Legislative and judicial powers are designated in the two Constitution Acts of 1867 and 1982). 2 1 | For a detailed discussion on international IA terminology, see chapter 1.3.; for tool typologies see subchapter 1.6. 2 | Brettel 2009a, 65.involved, analysts work with particular, individually structured, analytical tools or a combination thereof, representing a "contextualized lens." 10 In this environment, GBA can be applied "when appropriate" 11 as a single, independent add-on policy analysis tool.Traditionally, the Canadian model of public administration is marked by compromises made to accommodate the diverse needs of Canada's multi-cultural population, often yielding results that are cooked "not too hot, not too cold." 12This public service attitude is based on a multiculturalist interpretation of the Canadian Charter of Human Rights (1982), stipulated under Section 27. 13 Diversity of representation plays a vital role in this model.In Canada's federal public service the belief is widespread that in order for actions to be fair and inclusive, public sector employees must represent a diversity of gender, race, age, language, ethnic origin or aboriginal status, religion and disability. 14 However, some Canadian feminist researchers, such as Louise Chappell, have pointed out that despite the desire for or appearance of egalitarianism and diversity among public sector services and employees, the default norm continues to be neutral in an androcentric way.Perceptions of "[] appropriate forms of behaviour in the public service are, in fact, masculine." 15 While normative standards of acceptable, expected, rewarded behaviour might consist to be masculinist, the Canadian bureaucracy has feminised.Canada has over 200,000 public servants in the Core Public Administration (CPA), working in 27 federal departments and agencies and managed by the Treasury Board. 16 Employment equity policies in the Canadian bureaucracy seem to have proven effective, at least for women: For instance, in 2010, 54.8 per cent of public sector employees were female and 45.2 per cent were male. 17Another study, however, 10 | Atkinson et al. 2013, 142.11 | The official French translation is Analyse Comparative Entre Les Sexes (ACS), demarcating a theoretical framing disparity between the focus on biological sex in French and the socially constructed gender English.A linguistic analysis of origin and potential consequences for instrument application of those different connotations needs to be conducted before the background of the different Francophone and Anglophone philosophical and theoretical traditions and cannot be covered in the realm of this study.12 | Pal 2004, 200.Despite struggling with questions of framing and fit, participation and control, Canada does attempt to include e.g.indigenous knowledge or questions of sexual governance in its bureaucracy and policy making processes (Abele 2007; Smith 2007; Fleras/Maaka 2010).For questions of the representation of women in Canada's parliament and political parties, consult (Bashevkin 2009).

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict), Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Théorique ou conceptuel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Autre · Signal consensuel: Autre
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,774
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,059
Tête enseignante GPT0,312
Écart entre enseignants0,252 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle