MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4231035683 · doi:10.5858/2007-131-979-secoto

Sertoliform Endometrioid Carcinoma of the Ovary: A Potential Diagnostic Pitfall

2007· article· en· W4231035683 on OpenAlexaff
Anil Misir, Monalisa Sur

Bibliographic record

VenueArchives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOvarian cancer diagnosis and treatment
Canadian institutionsMcMaster UniversityJuravinski HospitalHamilton General Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOvaryCarcinomaPathologyCytokeratinCalretininMucinStainPopulationMedicineBiologyInternal medicineImmunohistochemistryStaining

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Sertoliform endometrioid carcinoma of the ovary (SEC) is an uncommon variant that bears histologic similarity to Sertoli and Sertoli-Leydig cell tumors (SLTs). Clinically, SEC affects an older population (60–70 years), while patients with SLT have an average age of 25 years and may exhibit endocrine manifestations. A number of histologic features can be used to distinguish the 2 entities, the most important ones being (1) the presence of areas with the usual pattern of endometrioid carcinoma, and (2) the presence of mucin at the apical borders of the tumor cells. Cytokeratin stains positively, while inhibin and calretinin stain negatively in SEC; the converse is true for SLTs. Based on the clinicopathologic behavior of this entity, SEC should be considered a well-differentiated carcinoma with relatively good prognosis if limited to the ovary.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.016
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.016
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.004
Scholarly communication0.0020.004
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0080.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArchives of Pathology & Laboratory MedicineSame topicOvarian cancer diagnosis and treatmentFrench-language works237,207