MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4231049189 · doi:10.1016/s2468-2667(18)30032-x

Single fathers: neglected, growing, and important

2018· letter· en· W4231049189 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
The Lancet Public Health

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Lancet Public Health · 2018
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIntergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSingle mothersSingle parentMental healthPopulationPublic healthDemographyGeographyPsychologyMedicineSociologyPsychiatryDevelopmental psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Families are changing worldwide. Of the world's 2·3 billion children, 320 million (14%) are living in a single-parent household—18% in France, 20% in Canada, 24% in the UK, 27% in the USA, and 43% in South Africa. Single-parent families are becoming increasingly common in many countries, mainly due to rising rates of divorce and couples having children outside of marriage. These trends are set to increase. The OECD report, Doing better for families, projects that by 2025–30 the proportion of sole-parent families is expected to rise in all OECD countries (except Germany), from 8% for Switzerland and the USA to 29% for New Zealand.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.026
Threshold uncertainty score0.832

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.069
GPT teacher head0.323
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Lancet Public HealthSame topicIntergenerational Family Dynamics and CaregivingFrench-language works237,207