MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4231056157 · doi:10.3166/ds.8.109-126

La vidéocommunication au primaire

2010· article· fr· W4231056157 on OpenAlexaff
Catherine Dumoulin, Jacqueline Bourdeau

Bibliographic record

VenueDistances et savoirs · 2010
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicFrench Language Learning Methods
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à MontréalUniversité de SherbrookeUniversité TÉLUQUniversité du Québec à Chicoutimi
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dans cet article, nous présentons une étude de cas visant à comprendre la nature et la source des difficultés à communiquer rencontrées et les comportements stratégiques mis en œuvre par des élèves du primaire pour surmonter leurs difficultés à communiquer à distance dans une situation d'apprentissage interculturelle intégrant la vidéocommunication.Cette étude de cas a également permis de dégager 10 recommandations pédagogiques pour les enseignants désireux de créer une situation d'apprentissage intégrant la vidéocommunication pour favoriser le développement de la compétence à communiquer oralement d'élèves du primaire dont la langue première est le français.ABSTRACT.The present study concerns the investigation of difficulties to communicate encountered by primary school children in a learning context integrating videocommunication.Also, it relates to the strategic behaviors showed by pupils to surmount their difficulties to communicate at a distance.The main goal is to understand their difficulties to communicate and strategic behaviors in order to propose educational recommendations to primary school teachers who wish to create learning context using videocommunication so as to improve pupils' oral communication skills.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.033
Threshold uncertainty score0.112

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0330.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.366
Teacher spread0.338 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDistances et savoirs→Same topicFrench Language Learning Methods→French-language works237,207→